Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PAR
One of the reasons I think Romney was so effective in the first debate

Romney was debating a passive Obama.

Ryan wasn't debating a passive Biden. Different strategy required.

Have a great nite.

44 posted on 10/15/2012 8:59:16 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: what's up; All

This is an interesting topic - I agree that if your opponent is bombastic and rude, you want to get out of the way and let them make a fool of themselves. But I also think that most people are making a judgment, independent of the behavior of the contestants, as to who is winning the debate “on points”. And I think their overall view of who won the debate is impacted by both style and perceived substance. That is why I think you have to make absolutely sure that you have effectively and agressively made your case. And winning on points does not necessarily mean stating the “truth”. It means “winning” the various different competitive “tussles” within the debate.


48 posted on 10/15/2012 9:11:57 PM PDT by PAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson