It’s a mystery to me why Hillary signed on to the video protest scenario from the get go if the State Dept. position, as revealed by the news conference, was never that the assault was a result of the video.
It makes Hillary look either deceptive or incompetent. (I think she’s both, but she wouldn’t want to be so obvious about it).
Was there a reason, not yet known, why she would conspire with the WH to deceive? If so, did they think that nothing would come of it until after the election?
Obama and Hillary had a meeting the other day, it was reported. I didn’t see a follow up on what was discussed. If a deal or truce was struck, Biden went off the reservation in the debate last night.
I wonder when those involved in the intel are going to stick their necks out?
Pat Caddell slams the media: They have become an enemy of the people (video 26:00)
IMO Hillary was being deceptive because she was involved in a conspiracy to bring about the terror in Benghazi. Yes I think she and Obama are both terrorists.
When Ambassador Kennedy and others say they got it from "the intelligence community" I think they are speaking of non-existent beings. FWIW I think Issa was speaking of intel personnel when he said "whistle blowers" told the Oversight Committee 'no one ever said that.'