Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House moves to insulate Biden, Obama on Libya Security question
Fox News ^ | October 12, 2012

Posted on 10/12/2012 10:40:51 AM PDT by Mrs. Frogjerk

The White House scrambled Friday to explain Vice President Biden's confusing statement that "we weren't told" of requests for more diplomatic security in Libya, claiming he was referring only to "himself" and President Obama.

Biden, during Thursday's debate, had made the controversial statement in response to criticism from Paul Ryan about the protection of diplomatic posts in Libya in the run-up to the Sept. 11 terror attack.

Moderator Martha Raddatz pressed him: "And they wanted more security there."

But Biden responded: "Well, we weren't told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security again."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/12/white-house-moves-to-insulate-biden-obama-on-libya-security-question/#ixzz296hua6h0

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biden; insulate; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
No, no, no! The buck stops with Biden and Obama. They are trying to say that Biden and Obama aren't responsible because They weren't contacted personally regarding the security situation in Libya! Obama and Biden CHOSE the people responsible for our citizens safety. They chose who was going to run the State Department so yes, it is their fault and they SHOULD have known! Ridiculous!
1 posted on 10/12/2012 10:40:54 AM PDT by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

The Administration put a drone over the site to watch the murders, but they didn’t put an F-16 over the site to prevent the murders.


2 posted on 10/12/2012 10:41:37 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (You didn't build that. The private sector is doing fine. We tried our plan and it worked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

Uh...Not attending intelligence briefings???


3 posted on 10/12/2012 10:43:28 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk
Maybe Obama should attend some of the security briefings that are prepared daily for him?

Maybe a little more time governing and a little less time partying or playing golf or vacationing?

4 posted on 10/12/2012 10:43:32 AM PDT by oldbrowser (An empty chair attracts a stadium full of empty chairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

That’s the old “plausible deniability’ argument. I knew it was coming. State tried to throw the WH under the bus. They’re going to find out that coupled with the media, the WH’s bus is bigger.


5 posted on 10/12/2012 10:43:45 AM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

That is the problem in a nut shell! They don’t know what the hell is going on because you have a sitting president going on the view so that he can be eye candy! Have they gone to any intelligence briefings? Or was Obama just too busy!!!!

The buck stops with those two idiots! That is that!


6 posted on 10/12/2012 10:49:40 AM PDT by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

Oh no Obama has convinced me now. The ambassador begged for more security, didn’t get it, and was slaughtered. And Obama’s defense is “ not my job, nobody told me”. Sure, that’s a good administration.


7 posted on 10/12/2012 10:49:47 AM PDT by Andrei Bulba (No Obama, no way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrei Bulba

What a flaming train wreck! I knew that this administration would be terrible but wow!


8 posted on 10/12/2012 10:51:20 AM PDT by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Andrei Bulba

They’re hoping that “lazy and incompetent” does less harm than “negligent and culpable”.


9 posted on 10/12/2012 10:53:59 AM PDT by kevkrom (If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

That’s the old “plausible deniability’ argument. I knew it was coming. State tried to throw the WH under the bus. They’re going to find out that coupled with the media, the WH’s bus is bigger.


10 posted on 10/12/2012 10:54:17 AM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

In my opinion what we may be seeing here is the beginnings of a major internal war within the Administration. Obastard has realized the Clinton’s were beginning to undermine him and position Hillary for 2016, and he is respondng by setting up to throw Her Thighness under the bus and destroy any future aspirations she has.


11 posted on 10/12/2012 10:56:22 AM PDT by commish (After Four Years of Obama, America needs a little R & R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

“But Biden responded: “Well, we weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security again.”

He obviously wasn’t speaking for himself so Carney is full of crap too!


12 posted on 10/12/2012 10:57:18 AM PDT by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

The @zzholes in the administration are having a contest to see who can fool us with the most convincing CYA memo.

Any bets on who wins?


13 posted on 10/12/2012 10:58:14 AM PDT by willibeaux (de ole Korean War vet age 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: commish

You could be right. But I’m leaning more towards Hillary being just as incompetent as Obama. They are all clueless and have absolutely no idea what they are doing!


14 posted on 10/12/2012 10:59:33 AM PDT by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: willibeaux

There are so many asses that need to be covered right now so I couldn’t even hazard a guess!


15 posted on 10/12/2012 11:01:32 AM PDT by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

I just heard on the radio that the administration is still “fuzzy” as to who knew what, when......


16 posted on 10/12/2012 11:03:50 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

Lie or Incompetence...either way, epic failure of this administration. Trust me, if you changed the names to Bush, Cheney, the left would be all over this calling for peoples heads (as well they should be). Least we forget, people died because of this...........

And as one lady admitted in the Oversite hearing the other day, funding or lack of it, was not an issue in the lack of security...she stated they how have gotten the money from somewhere!

PLUS they could have “Thought” this out, they should have been able to say “GET THEM SECURITY” without being asked for!
In business we call it “thinking outside the box”...............you would think the GREAT SKILLED MASTERMAN Obama who’s brilliance is so superior to all others...could have, should have understood this fact and handled looking out for one of our own without being asked.


17 posted on 10/12/2012 11:05:13 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

Joe always refers to himself in the first-person plural. Hello, we are Joe Biden, and we didn’t know anything about anybody asking for more security anywhere.


18 posted on 10/12/2012 11:07:26 AM PDT by kevao (Is your ocean any lower than it was four years ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Frogjerk

Carney is saying the “we” meant obama, Biden and the voices in Biden’s head.


19 posted on 10/12/2012 11:12:00 AM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

[ They’re hoping that “lazy and incompetent” does less harm than “negligent and culpable”. ]

LoL.. that would be a very good punch line for some aspiring comic..

EXCEPT that ....

Eric Holder(Attorney General) is Barry Obama’s “bitch”..
could be dangerous these days.. “punch lines can”

** lots of Barry’s “bitches” there in Washington D.C.
i.e. the heads of the CIA, FBI, NSA, BATF, Secret Service, Joint Chiefs, CEOS of most major media, almost any academic institution, almost any HollyWierdo with a couple of million to rub together.. and last but not least several FOX anchors.. almost all Presstitutes..


20 posted on 10/12/2012 11:18:28 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson