Domestic situations are nasty, but to keep advancing on a man in his home when he has told you that he has a gun cannot be blamed on being under the influence.
1 posted on
10/11/2012 4:02:46 AM PDT by
marktwain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: marktwain
Since when does “unarmed” mean “not at all dangerous in any way whatsoever”?
2 posted on
10/11/2012 4:06:37 AM PDT by
Flintlock
(-THE TRUTH--It's the NEW hate speech.)
To: marktwain
Unwise actions by the late Mr. Fredenburg.
3 posted on
10/11/2012 4:10:05 AM PDT by
Tax-chick
(Una bruja.)
To: marktwain
Harper fatally shot Fredenberg three timesKilled the guy three times???
4 posted on
10/11/2012 4:10:58 AM PDT by
laker_dad
To: marktwain
It looks like he was looking for a fight, and got one.
5 posted on
10/11/2012 4:12:10 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: marktwain
“while prosecutors in the state say theyve become increasingly hamstrung by a piece of 2009 legislation that makes it more difficult to charge cases in which self-defense issues are raised....”
So how many prosecutors say that? Two? One?
Pet store owners say that they’ve seen Tristan Scott buying flea soap; therefore, she sleeps with dogs.
6 posted on
10/11/2012 4:13:12 AM PDT by
sergeantdave
(The FBI has declared war on the Marine Corps)
To: marktwain
I have all ways told people it is real stupid to tell some one that is armed. You are going to hurt or kill them.
To: marktwain
How do we know he is telling the truth?
The link did not work.
8 posted on
10/11/2012 4:13:33 AM PDT by
sakic
To: marktwain
That castle doctrine works both ways.
My initial reaction was, chain the b***ch
to the front porch and see if mr romantically
involved comes to visit/help.
Sometimes initial reactions are just that.
11 posted on
10/11/2012 4:19:37 AM PDT by
wita
To: marktwain
The Sept. 22 shooting death of 40-year-old Dan Fredenberg occurred inside the garage of Brice Harper, who had reportedly drawn Fredenbergs ire after becoming romantically involved with the mans wife. Did he fear for his life or was he eliminating her husband.???
Harper fatally shot Fredenberg three times.
That answers my question.
He should have been indicted. No Castle Doctrine for him.
To: marktwain
Domestic situations are nasty, but to keep advancing on a man in his home when he has told you that he has a gun cannot be blamed on being under the influence. Then again, all we have is Mr Harper's word that things happened the way he said they did. Mr Fredenberg was a fool for confronting Mr Harper where he did. He was a double fool for blaming Harper for his wife's behavior.
14 posted on
10/11/2012 4:26:07 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(Charlie Daniels - Payback Time http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWwTJj_nosI)
To: marktwain
"Harper, 24, was standing in the threshold to his home when an unarmed Fredenberg entered the garage and advanced toward him, according to the police investigation. Harper fatally shot Fredenberg three times, and told police he feared for his life."
Good enough. Castle doctrine (as usual) has nothing to do with it. "Romantic" entanglements with another man's wife generally lead to murder and mayhem. I have no doubt he feared for his life when the offended husband darkened his doorway.
15 posted on
10/11/2012 4:29:00 AM PDT by
PowderMonkey
(WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
To: marktwain
It is one man's word involved here, and whatever forensic evidence that can be gathered.
There is the possibility that the shooter discovered the affair, lured the guy to the property and then shot an unarmed man as part of a premeditated plot to eliminate his rival.
If law enforcement cannot demonstrate that such a setup took place, it will be very hard to charge him and castle doctrine applies.
If the wife invited the man to her home, then it should not apply. He was a guest, no matter how unwelcome he was to one resident.
To: marktwain
do I understand from what little I can get of this poorly written article that the adulterer murdered the husband of the woman he was fornicating with? So, this needs to be a murder investigation.
Surely, these two depraved individuals set this up. Oh, I’ll have H come over to “talk this out.” Then I will say he threatened me in my castle shoot him and claim the Castle doctrine. Then his wife and I will live happily ever after with all his money. uh huh. great.
19 posted on
10/11/2012 4:54:11 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: marktwain
21 posted on
10/11/2012 4:58:24 AM PDT by
preacher
(Communism has only killed 100 million people: Let's give it another chance!)
To: marktwain
If it were up to the gun grabbers the law would require the shooter (defender) to have been beaten severely and on the verge of dying before he could shoot an unarmed man.
Only then, could it be proven that his life was at stake and to shoot was finally “earned.”
32 posted on
10/11/2012 5:48:19 AM PDT by
DH
(Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
To: marktwain
Sounds like a good shoot from the description
39 posted on
10/11/2012 6:00:49 AM PDT by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: marktwain
The late and cuckholded Mr. Fredenberg's autopsy showed a blood alcohol level of 0.08. For the purposes of driving, that's drunk under the laws of all 50 states.
Talk amongst yourselves.
42 posted on
10/11/2012 6:08:50 AM PDT by
Scoutmaster
(You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
To: marktwain
wonder how much of a setup this is... had he been convicted, wifey would have gotten rid of hubby AND lover, and been free to start all over again...
68 posted on
10/11/2012 6:58:43 AM PDT by
camle
(keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
To: marktwain
70 posted on
10/11/2012 7:01:19 AM PDT by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: marktwain
In retrospect, Fredenberg’s beef should have been with his wife, not with her lover in her lover’s garage.
80 posted on
10/11/2012 7:26:41 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("Why not eliminate the middle man and have whoever feeds Obama his lines debate Romney directly?")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson