To: marktwain
If it were up to the gun grabbers the law would require the shooter (defender) to have been beaten severely and on the verge of dying before he could shoot an unarmed man.
Only then, could it be proven that his life was at stake and to shoot was finally “earned.”
32 posted on
10/11/2012 5:48:19 AM PDT by
DH
(Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
To: DH
how about this ~ the now dead husband was preparing to defend himself against an attempt to give him a possibly untreatable STD and needed take the offending member to a laboratory for close and detailed evaluation.
I'd say the Castle Doctrine extends to all the various rooms and cavities in the family home, wouldn't you?
To: DH
If it were up to the gun grabbers the law would require the shooter (defender) to have been beaten severely and on the verge of dying before he could shoot an unarmed man.Even that may not be sufficient.
Two words: Trayvon Martin.
155 posted on
10/13/2012 7:44:54 PM PDT by
rmh47
(Go Kats! - Got eight? [NRA Life Member])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson