Posted on 10/10/2012 4:19:09 PM PDT by mojito
The Obama administrations Benghazi response continued to unravel at the House Oversight Committee hearing today, as State Department officials struggled unsuccessfully to get their stories straight.
Ambassador Patrick Kennedy defended UN Ambassador Susan Rices claim on September 16 that the attack was part of a spontaneous protest that erupted over an anti-Islam video, saying that anyone at the State Department would have said the same thing as Rice based on the intelligence available at the time. If any administration official, including any career official, were on television on Sunday, September 16, they would have said what Ambassador Rice said. The information she had at that point from the intelligence community is the same that I had at that point, said Kennedy.
But, as Republicans on the Oversight Committee pointed out, that appears to contradict Kennedys comments from a September 12 unclassified briefing, when he reportedly called it a terrorist attack.
Another State Department official, Charlene Lamb, wrote in her prepared testimony (but did not read aloud) that she was able to monitor the attack in almost real-time once a Diplomatic Security agent activated the imminent danger notification system. Yet she didnt explain why the State Department and other administration officials initially said spontaneous protests were responsible for the attack, if there had been officials monitoring it in real-time.
(Excerpt) Read more at commentarymagazine.com ...
Congressman Trey Gowdy at the hearings says it all for all of us wondering WTF is going on up there in DC..
video down the page...
Because they're all incompetent, PC, American hating, affirmative action buoyed imbeciles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.