Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bret Baier's Benghazi timeline was a complete damning indictment of Obama Administration

Posted on 10/10/2012 4:01:01 PM PDT by dead

Vanity!

Wow, Bret Baier just presented a well documented timeline on the Obama Administration's disgusting behavior regarding the death of our Ambassador and others in Libya.

It was positively devastating!

He notes that the State Department had already concluded that there were absolutely NO protests outside the embassy and the attack was a coordinated terrorist attack. Then, AFTER THAT, Hillary stood next to the Ambassador's dead body and denounced the stupid YouTube video that she KNEW had nothing to do with it.

Then AFTER THAT, Obama went on David Letterman to condemn this completely irrelevant video.

Then Susan Rice went on five separate Sunday morning talk shows and repeatedly stated that it was NOT a terrorist attack, but protests about the video that got out of hand.

This was FIVE freaking days after the State Department and the White House knew this was a lie.

Clips of various FoxNews reports about the lack of protests, or various politicians stating that they had been informed unequivocally that it was a coordinated terrorist attack days before the Obama Administration continued to sell their pack of lies.

If the report becomes available on the Fox website, email links to everybody you know, especially fence sitters. It's not a lot of new information, but presented in such a manner as to form a completely devastating indictement of the Administration.

What an absolute disgrace!

Baier also notes that the NY Times, for days, never mentioned terrorism or al Qaeda after the foreign press and Fox News had been reporting the proven connections.

Contrary to the image they have of themselves, daily NY Times readers are among the worst informed people on earth.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911ii; benghazi; benghazigate; benghazitimeline; bho44; bhostatedept; bretbaier; coverup; foxnews; impeachnow; libya; soshillary; vanity; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: potlatch
I think we are going start seeing some fireworks between them shortly, this is heating up and fast.

It certainly is a tangled web, and because they both lie so much it is getting harder than ever to coordinate their lies, what did I say yesterday, what's the spin today.

Hard to say who will yell "Uncle" first, but when push comes to shove, guaranteed someone will blink first.

I sure would like to see some enterprising young reporter take on the job of Bob Woodward in this matter and find himself a Deep Throat.

I wasn't a big fan of Nixon, but Watergate was nothing compared to the murders of 4 men, and I want to see revenge on Hillary for her part in those trials. Maybe this is it.

61 posted on 10/10/2012 10:13:15 PM PDT by annieokie (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DManA
It just doesn’t make any sense. They knew the truth. They knew it truth was no secret. Were they just so arrogant they thought they could get away with lying?

This is the way they've operated all along. We had scandal after scandal in the 90's under Clinton and they got away with it all. Now it is Obama's MO.

They are getting caught more than usual with Benghazi and it is taking them by surprise.

62 posted on 10/10/2012 10:21:27 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: potlatch
She’s a socialist, loved Alinsky, but to me she’s not as bad as Obama - who is?

She is definitely as bad as Obama.

Actually, more dangerous because she is more plodding where he is impetuous. He just seems worse because he's jumping the shark. Hillary would move more slowly and effectively. The only reason she can't get on top of this current scandal is because she doesn't hold the reins.

63 posted on 10/10/2012 10:24:03 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dead


64 posted on 10/10/2012 11:29:54 PM PDT by Bon mots (Abu Ghraib: 47 Times on the front page of the NY Times | Benghazi: 2 Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia

THe Taliban are in the building..Nordstrom. Just wow.

That 50 minute tape needs to be found before it gets chewed up.


65 posted on 10/11/2012 2:30:03 AM PDT by SueRae (See it? Hell, I can TASTE November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

bump for later


66 posted on 10/11/2012 2:46:28 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

He summed up this entire administration with that cryptic remark. It was chilling and stopped me in my tracks.


67 posted on 10/11/2012 3:15:08 AM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: atc23

What I don’t understand is why we gave them 30,000 missiles in the first place? What were OUR missiles doing in Libya?


68 posted on 10/11/2012 3:33:36 AM PDT by gotribe (He's a mack-daddy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AV415yit7Zg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dead

bump

I made a vanity thread for FReeper input on how the media is reporting this on the day after the hearings

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2943173/posts


69 posted on 10/11/2012 4:13:56 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Nordstrom’s comments confirms that the enemy is within the gates. The entire security structure of the United States is being sacrificed in pursuit of a completely misguided foreign policy. The only question is whether the perpetrators are acting out of a combination of naivety and incompetence or are intentionally sabotaging the interests of the United States. I know where I stand on that question.


70 posted on 10/11/2012 5:53:16 AM PDT by littleharbour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: littleharbour

I looks as if it’s going to be up to Romney / Ryan if this thing grows legs.

Paging Mr. Woodward; Mr Carl Woodward? Have you gone deaf and blind Mr Woodward?


71 posted on 10/11/2012 6:01:35 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

[I sure would like to see some enterprising young reporter take on the job of Bob Woodward in this matter and find himself a Deep Throat.]

Me too, Annie. All this horrible stuff being exposed and half of the citizens aren’t even aware of or just ignore it. ‘Gunrunners’ seemed to fizzle out, and Obama will probably escape this this too. Like you said, this is worse than Watergate.


72 posted on 10/11/2012 3:47:55 PM PDT by potlatch (~~And the truth IS what counts, RIGHT ? ~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: potlatch
maybe won't happen because they are democrats, but sure would be nice to see someone have some principals left to do some deep investigating. I know I'm dreaming.

Yet, who knows, after yesterdays hearing, anything is possible now. They can't hide forever, and the career personnel WILL not/are not going to take the blame, someone will talk, guaranteed.

Anything done in the dark, will come to light.

73 posted on 10/11/2012 3:54:05 PM PDT by annieokie (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: what's up

[She is definitely as bad as Obama.]

I guess I base my feelings on ‘islam’. I fear it more than a lot of other things and we KNOW Obama sides with the muslims and enables them at every opportunity. I fear it for the future of our children and grandchildren.

In 8 years of the Clintons I never saw that other than their seeming affection for Arafat [and Huma]. I think Hillary is better at hiding her desires and agendas, whereas Obama’s are often too obvious to be hidden.
As you wrote, “plodding vs impetuous”


74 posted on 10/11/2012 4:15:16 PM PDT by potlatch (~~And the truth IS what counts, RIGHT ? ~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

I watched some of yesterdays hearings too. Just hope this stays in the news in the next few weeks and more stuff leaks out.........times getting short!

I’m nervous about tonight’s debate, lol, hope Biden looks like the doofus he is!!


75 posted on 10/11/2012 4:26:23 PM PDT by potlatch (~~And the truth IS what counts, RIGHT ? ~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: potlatch
Hope it stays in the news?? lol. It will, the administration just can't hep themselves. Every one of their little flunkies thinks they have something to add to the fray. The just keep parading out into the spotlight, and wish they hadn't. lol

Let em talk, loose lips and all...........Also, I don't think FOX news will let up on it, it's getting too juicy.

Soon you will see the other MSN's play catch up on this. They will have to regain some credibility sometime.

Tonight's debate: gonna be great, never fear. Praying that the LORD will put stumbling blocks in "Walter" Biden's mouth. I prayed that in the Pres. debate, it worked.

76 posted on 10/11/2012 4:43:19 PM PDT by annieokie (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

[Praying that the LORD will put stumbling blocks in “Walter” Biden’s mouth. I prayed that in the Pres. debate, it worked. ]

Me too Annie! Don’t think I’ve ever been so excited and impressed over a debate than Romney’s. Best in 40yrs I’ve read. Lord please keep it going......


77 posted on 10/11/2012 4:57:49 PM PDT by potlatch (~~And the truth IS what counts, RIGHT ? ~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: potlatch
I never have seen anything like it, it was as if the LORD actually honored my prayer, as Obama was dumbfounded, confused and unable to coherently speak to the issues.

I pray this same pray for tonight, against Biden. Will see what happens.

78 posted on 10/11/2012 5:11:59 PM PDT by annieokie (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; ex91B10

#52, your #53 and ex91B10’s #55, little jeremiah! BTTT!

(sorry about the long response...home from work...just catching up on the pings)

“Because they knew about the anti-Muslim movie beforehand, very possibly had a hand in it, and knew that attacks were on the way, and were planning to use the anti-Muslim movie “causing” the attacks as a way to prohibit free speech. Sort of a “movie” version Fast and Furious.”

WORTH REPEATING BUMP!


79 posted on 10/11/2012 5:24:02 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson