I think that Romney’s essential position is simple and clear: He will reinstate the executive orders banning the Federal Gov’t funding abortions. He has also been very clear in his statements that he will nominate “strict constructionist” judges.
Other than that, he is going to focus on the “Economy, stupid”, and if Congress puts a bill on his desk, he will consider it at that time.
I personally think that he would sign such bills as pertains to partial birth abortion, etc., and that his pro-life conversion was real and a significant event in his life, but that really hasn’t been tested, and can’t be until under fire. It will be a surprise to me if the Senate can put such a bill on his desk. I believe also, he is a man of his word, and he has spend so many words courting conservatives on this issue, he will honor those words.
None of us even know what that "real" conversion consisted of, or the why of it, one day in 2005 when he was starting his presidential run Mitt suddenly said out of the blue that he was talking to a scientist and suddenly switched, a lame story, and one that the scientist says didn't happen.
Besides, now that he is safe, Romney has reverted back to his pro-abortion position and rejected the party platform.
As far as being "clear" on judges, we know what he did when he was Governor, and we know what his politics and goals are, so we have to cling to the hope that he has made a TOTAL flip on judges as well.