[MrB]

I think this is a good ruling, as well.
Abortion supporters, for too long, have been able to hide behind the mythical difference between abortion and infanticide.

This draws a line in the sand. You have to admit that abortion is killing a baby and defend infanticide, or you have to choose to oppose abortion as you would infanticide as morally repugnant.

I heard testimony from a man making the case for the equivalence of abortion and infanticide, and he said some young women approached him afterwards and told him he had convinced them - they were now pro-infanticide.

[TigersEye]

I'm with you. The judge was just being consistent with the law and the prevailing societal attitude that created it. Now let all those who support abortion face the reality of their POV. They have deemed it OK to kill human beings that might cause them emotional discomfort, economic struggle or lifestyle inconvenience.

Well, others of us have our own lists of humans that get on our nerves. It's time for our rights to be recognized too! /s