Maybe because she is not required to take an oath?
Article VI of the U.S. Constitution says: "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."
Even in 1789, the Founders made sure to respect the rights of those who did not follow the majority's views of religion. Too bad you can't do the same.
But that affirmation of the Constitution is upholding its intent-—which is that our Rights come from God. It is really quite clear and the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land and any laws that contradict the Constitution are Null and Void—so John Marshall stated. There has been no elimination of God’s Laws by an amendment that I have seen (yet). When they take the concept of God built into our Constitution, OUT, then we cease to be free. We will be “Ruled by Man” (like Germany, Italy, Russia was/is). “Rule of Law” of our Republic demands a “Higher Law” than man’s.
Stalin is the one who put Separation of Church and State in his Constitution. it doesn’t exist in ours. There is no establishment of religion by Congress when people mention God and Jesus Christ where ever. The government has NO right to censor any religious speech at all, anywhere, even by teachers in government schools. McGuffey Readers were filled with Biblical passages until the 1930’s when the Atheist John Dewey forced God out of the public square and started indoctrinating children into his radical religion—secular humanism, and getting Marxist judges to destroy our legal system and our freedoms.
Atheists used to not be allowed at all—as jurists, in office—not until the socialists were stacked on our courts by Wilson and FDR, did our legal system warp the meaning of the 1st Amendment and insert Stalin’s plank.
When we have a system of Rule of Law which according to Blackstone and the political theorists of that day and hundreds of years later—meant that there is a “Higher Law” than man-made law (which is arbitrary, if not based on “Laws of Nature and nature’s God” which has to be the guiding Principle of our Constitution for Right Reason (which goes back to Aristotle, Cicero, Aquinas, Locke, Blackstone and then, John Marshall).
MLK, Jr. and the Nuremberg Trials AGAIN brought up the idea that there is a Higher Law— God’s Laws which was affirmed in our Court again. There was no trouble stating God for over 200 years in our history......hmmmmmm...... Stating “God” is not establishing any religion (what religion could it possibly be?????) Why is Atheism the only allowed religion in the public square now—when that is Stalin’s type of government? We aren’t a evil dictatorship.
If this woman refuses to acknowledge God Given Rights—than she is not in support of our Founding Documents and the type of government which is based on God’s Laws. They have a right to deny her office—since she couldn’t possibly understand the First Principles of our government.