Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Viennacon

It might as well have been reported at 5%, as far out of touch with reality as it already was.

Such a change would require 5% economic growth, and we’re below 2%.


7 posted on 10/05/2012 1:52:39 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: MrB
Such a change would require 5% economic growth, and we’re below 2%.

Only if it's based on folks finding work. The U3 unemployment rate (that perverse statistic that only counts folks looking for work as unemployed) could drop 0.3% or more on the basis of lots of folks giving up looking for work regardless of how many folks found work. Didn't labor force participation also dip in September?

20 posted on 10/05/2012 2:43:37 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: MrB

Incidentally, I see the U6 was unchanged. Evidently the drop in the U3 (and U4 and U5) was due entirely (up to rounding error) to people getting part-time work or leaving the labor force.


42 posted on 10/05/2012 5:10:56 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson