[jda]

The saddest thing, given the history of the annointed one and his minions, is that the suspicions are totally believable!

There is a term in the Bible regarding leaders - they are to be “above reproach”. For the 0bama loyalistas, that means that no one would even entertain a charge against the leader. 0bama is FAR from being above approach!!!

[opentalk]

Allen West On The Unemployment Rate Miraculously Dropping 1 Month Before Election: “Representative Of Saul Alinsky Tactics”…

I agree with former GE CEO Jack Welch, Chicago style politics is at work here. Somehow by manipulation of data we are all of a sudden below 8 percent unemployment, a month from the Presidential election.

This is Orwellian to say the least and representative of Saul Alinsky tactics from the book “Rules for Radicals”- a must read for all who want to know how the left strategize . Trust the Obama administration? Sure, and the spontaneous reaction to a video caused the death of our Ambassador……and pigs fly.

[Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America]

How ODD that the last time unemployment was 7.8% was JANUARY 2009, OBAMA'S FIRST MONTH IN OFFICE.

SNAKE OIL!!!!

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec	Annual
2002	5.7	5.7	5.7	5.9	5.8	5.8	5.8	5.7	5.7	5.7	5.9	6.0
2003	5.8	5.9	5.9	6.0	6.1	6.3	6.2	6.1	6.1	6.0	5.8	5.7
2004	5.7	5.6	5.8	5.6	5.6	5.6	5.5	5.4	5.4	5.5	5.4	5.4
2005	5.3	5.4	5.2	5.2	5.1	5.0	5.0	4.9	5.0	5.0	5.0	4.9
2006	4.7	4.8	4.7	4.7	4.6	4.6	4.7	4.7	4.5	4.4	4.5	4.4
2007	4.6	4.5	4.4	4.5	4.4	4.6	4.7	4.6	4.7	4.7	4.7	5.0
2008	5.0	4.9	5.1	5.0	5.4	5.6	5.8	6.1	6.1	6.5	6.8	7.3
2009	7.8	8.3	8.7	8.9	9.4	9.5	9.5	9.6	9.8	10.0	9.9	9.9
2010	9.7	9.8	9.8	9.9	9.6	9.4	9.5	9.6	9.5	9.5	9.8	9.4
2011	9.1	9.0	8.9	9.0	9.0	9.1	9.1	9.1	9.0	8.9	8.7	8.5
2012	8.3	8.3	8.2	8.1	8.2	8.2	8.3	8.1	7.8

[C19fan]

Would you these actual number are cooked too:

Household Survey: Unemployment fell from 6% to 5.8% and civilian employment increased by 440,000

Establishment Survey: Only 14,000 increase in non-farm employment

...........................................

These are from Nov 2003 when Bush the Younger was in office.

[usconservative]

Let’s get serious about the jobless rate here for just a minute.

Number of “new jobs created” in September: 114,000

Number of first-time jobless claims in September: 367,000 (Week ending Sept. 28th)

The average weekly first time jobless claims in September averaged over 360,000 which means in September, 1,440,000 people lost their jobs and had to find a new one.

Does it stand to reason to anyone with a functioning brain that the unemployment rate could “drop” three-tenths of a percent with those numbers?

It’s mathematically impossible!

UNLESS YOU STOP COUNTING THOSE WHO’VE FALLEN OFF THE ROLLS, THOSE WHO’VE GIVEN UP LOOKING AND FOUND A WAY TO SHRINK THE LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE!

A look at the Labor Force Participation Rate tells the TRUE STORY behind the 7.8% number. Our economy is at an ALL TIME LOW in the percentage of working age adults that have full-time employment.

Since January of 2009, the Labor Force Participation Rate which the Bureau of Labor Statistics maintains shows that the rate has steadily declined under Obama!

Under Obama, the Labor Force Participation Rate, which was at record high’s under Bush have fallen to historic lows under Obama!

Who’s to blame for that? Obama and his FAILED ECONOMIC POLICIES, THAT”S WHO!

I think most American’s with a reasonably functioning brain, capable of doing basic math can see how Obama’s been DESTROYING our economy and driving people out of the work force to artificially deflate the unemployment numbers!

Great spin, if one can pull it off – but the DATA shows Obama and his policies to be an abysmal failure.

Now here’s the truth about the stellar “job creation” the Associated Pravda (I meant “Press”) is telling about the economy:

It's now being reported that the economy created 114,000 jobs.

That's 114,000 across all 50 states.

That's 2,280 jobs per state. (114,000 / 50)

That's 570 jobs per week, per state. (2280 / 4 weeks)

What does that mean for the average job seeker? There are only 81 jobs per day, per state are being created under the Obama economy! (This is the stat that Romney needs for the next debate!)

Yeah, I guess I don't blame Obama for not wanting to talk about the economy during the debate the other night!

[AngelesCrestHighway]

[ColdOne]

I only need to see the name ....Solis and I know the numbers are false.

[libs_kma]

Rush said over a year ago that by hook or by crook, the job number would be under 8% by election day. He was exactly right...it was by crook.

[Stosh]

Are we still at war with EastAsia? or is it Oceania?

[AaronInCarolina]

My guess is that Obama’s illegal changes to the Welfare Work Requirements resulted in a lot of things now being considered as temporary work.

[Qbert]

“Only in an era of depressingly diminished expectations could the September jobs report be called a good one. It really isn’t. Not at all.

1. Yes, the U-3 unemployment rate fell to 7.8%, the first time it has been below 8% since January 2009. But that’s only due to a flood of 582,000 part-time jobs. As the Labor Department noted:

The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) rose from 8.0 million in August to 8.6 million in September. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job.

2. And take-home pay? Over the past 12 months, average hourly earnings have risen by just 1.8 percent. When you take inflation into account, wages are flat to down...”

http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/10/the-sickly-stagnant-september-jobs-report/

[Mr. K]

Great! This will certainly help Obama some more...

[CodeToad]

Only in the Communist administration of Obama can more people be thrown out of work but there is less unemployment. Communist propaganda only works on the feeble minded.

[Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America]

HIGHEST 1 MONTH JUMP IN 29 YEARS

LOL!

[Rusty0604]

Maybe the BLS adopted the welfare work requirements, so if someone wrote in a journal or got a message they “worked”.

[xuberalles]

In July, 181,000 jobs were added: 8.3% unemployment
In August, 142,000 jobs were added: 8.1% unemployment
September, 114,000 jobs were added: 7.8% unemployment.
Yeah, right! Anything to get re-elected!

[xuberalles]

In July, 181,000 jobs were added: 8.3% unemployment
In August, 142,000 jobs were added: 8.1% unemployment
September, 114,000 jobs were added: 7.8% unemployment.
Yeah, right! Anything to get re-elected!

[stephenjohnbanker]

” One reason for the rise was an upward revision of 86,000 to the July and August jobs numbers—all of which came from a 91,000 increase in the estimate of public sector jobs. Private sector job estimates were actually revised downward by 5,000.”

Thank you, BB

[bgill]

No way. Many part time and seasonal jobs were eliminated with the summer tourist season over with and student workers going back to school. There will be part time seasonal jobs opening up again during the holidays but I don’t see as many this year as in the past. People won’t be spending as much during the holidays as they’ve done in the past and if gas is high then they won’t travel.

[KeyLargo]

Moneynews

Jack Welch: Obama Cooking the Books on Jobs

Friday, October 5, 2012 09:17 AM

By: Forrest Jones

The U.S. economy added a net 114,000 jobs in September, while the unemployment rate fell to a surprisingly low 7.8 percent, a number former GE boss Jack Welch described as cooked up by the Obama administration.

The September jobs number brought the unemployment rate below 8 percent for the first time in about four years.

Total employment rose by 873,000 in September, following three months of little change, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Editor’s Note: Obama Donor Banned This Video But You Can Watch it Here

“Unbelievable jobs numbers ... these Chicago guys will do anything ... can’t debate so change numbers,” Welch said on his Twitter page, referring to President Barack Obama’s performance in the first presidential debate earlier this week.

Other experts expressed similar surprise.

http://www.moneynews.com/PrintTemplate?nodeid=458814