To: illiac
When I sold my house in 99 in DFW I saw red flags.
When I bought it in 84 I had to have 15% down, when I sold it all the lady had to have was a pay stub. She got in for $400.00.
3 posted on
10/02/2012 11:32:59 AM PDT by
hadaclueonce
(you are paying 12% more for fuel because of Ethanol. Smile big Corn Lobby,)
To: hadaclueonce
I’m also seeing in MarketWatch that the points being paid to fannie and freddie may go upsignificantly....
7 posted on
10/02/2012 11:35:14 AM PDT by
illiac
(If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
To: hadaclueonce
I drove by last year. Broke down basketball goal in the driveway. No grass, broken garage door window.
Bet she has the free phone.
9 posted on
10/02/2012 11:35:27 AM PDT by
hadaclueonce
(you are paying 12% more for fuel because of Ethanol. Smile big Corn Lobby,)
To: hadaclueonce
You and I sold on the first wave, if you sold in ‘99. I sold in 2002. The “appreciation” (read: speculative premium) achieved by the home 2002 > 2007 was MORE THAN THE ENTIRE AMOUNT I SOLD FOR. I bot: $300K, 1995. I sold $500K 2002. It sold for $850K in 2005 and $1.2 MM in 2007.
13 posted on
10/02/2012 11:38:48 AM PDT by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(This stuff we're going through now, this is nothing compared to the middle ages.)
To: hadaclueonce
exactly. It’s good that lenders are being strict now instead of creating a new bubble
31 posted on
10/03/2012 12:47:56 AM PDT by
Cronos
(**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson