Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Low-Information Voters: It’s Time to Rethink “One Man, One Vote.”
PIQ Score ^ | Sept 29, 2012 | Cincinnatus

Posted on 10/02/2012 9:35:34 AM PDT by bkopto

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: bkopto

“2) If you don’t pay any sort of taxes – income tax, property tax, capital gains, something other than sales tax – you vote is automatically reduced by 50%.”

Dumb idea. What about retirees and military members serving in a combat zone?


81 posted on 10/02/2012 12:51:57 PM PDT by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tnlibertarian

the best way to achieve this is to eliminate the tax code.

make all govt funding voluntary, i.e. people who earn and create wealth can decide for themselves how much to kick back to governments. Then it would matter less what morons were elected, the smart people could just ‘defund’ them when they got out of line.

Freedom works every time.


82 posted on 10/02/2012 12:57:11 PM PDT by fnord (freedom is scary to some, especially other people's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: jusduat
Property ownership or military service.

LOL! The Clintons could not have voted in 1992 or 1996.

83 posted on 10/02/2012 12:59:10 PM PDT by Churchillspirit (9/11/2001. NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

No vote for Limbaugh.


84 posted on 10/02/2012 1:06:39 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Not since the 14th Amendment, its not. And especially if you’re in a Southern state. Just try requiring voters to provide photo ID, if you doubt me...


85 posted on 10/02/2012 1:08:30 PM PDT by Little Ray (AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sakic

>>No vote for Limbaugh.

Anyone worth a darn would serve to become a citizen
I suspect Limbaugh would have done so under that criteria
If he didn’t, it’s his beeswax


86 posted on 10/02/2012 1:17:17 PM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
how about one vote for every tax dollar PAID

.

87 posted on 10/02/2012 1:22:58 PM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Now that is truly an interesting idea! I’ve actually pondered on that!

I think...........that it would have the effect of seriously restraining Federal Central Gov’t authority over the States.
Found at Wikipedia: “Critics of the Seventeenth Amendment claim that by altering the way senators are elected, the states lost any representation they had in the federal government and that this led to the gradual “slide into ignominy” of state legislatures,[2] as well as an overextension of federal power and the rise of special interest groups to fill the power vacuum previously occupied by state legislatures. In addition, concerns have been raised about the power of governors to appoint temporary replacements to fill vacant senate seats, both in terms of how this provision should be interpreted and whether it should be permitted at all. Accordingly, noted public figures have expressed a desire to reform or even repeal the Seventeenth Amendment.”


88 posted on 10/02/2012 1:28:45 PM PDT by Rich21IE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

“I think originally the founding fathers only wanted property owners to vote.”

I’ve been saying this for years.


89 posted on 10/02/2012 1:52:10 PM PDT by READINABLUESTATE ("We must hang together, gentlemen...else, we shall most assuredly hang separately." - Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

But he had a boo boo on his knee.


90 posted on 10/02/2012 9:36:48 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

No Pay....No Say


91 posted on 10/02/2012 9:40:11 PM PDT by I_be_tc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #92 Removed by Moderator

To: fatasshick

The fat ass chick has volunteered that she does not deserve to vote and will pass on this year’s election.


93 posted on 10/03/2012 7:19:37 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

Israel uses that system I believe. 2 years of mandatory national service is required for everyone. If you aren’t up to IDF standards, there are non-military roles.


94 posted on 10/04/2012 12:45:43 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2; MrB; rarestia
No, actually that's a horrible idea. Tying the vote to land ownership in agrarian America where land meant wealth made good sense. Also, it's important to note that land ownership in early America, did NOT include domiciles, but was meant to include only workable, profitable land, or profitable structures (read business). However, the industrial revolution changed all that, and the digital age even more.

Today, in the 21st century, I could show you a crack house in Oak Cliff (Dallas sub) that someone owns. 10 miles away, I can show you highly productive citizens that live in the residences at the Ritz Carlton, some of which are owned, and some of which are rented from the Ritz.

Now I own a home at the moment. A home that in later life I intend to sell in favor of an upkeep provided residence be it a condo or apartment. It makes absolutely no sense why I should lose my right to vote because I made a practical decision as age dictates a change in lifestyle.

The idea that land ownership grants a greater stake in America really is so 18th century.

95 posted on 10/04/2012 1:05:53 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Melas

You said “land”, we said “property”.


96 posted on 10/04/2012 1:07:25 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee

Then if you are an average middle class American, Barbara Streisand will not only cancel your vote, but the vote of everyone for miles around you. Bill Gates and George Soros can get together and elect everyone between the two of them. (not really) but it’s only slight hyperbole.


97 posted on 10/04/2012 1:09:37 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: MrB

My wedding ring is property. My automobile is property. My wristwatch is property. Hell, even my dog is property. Now if you mean real property, that’s also known as land.


98 posted on 10/04/2012 1:14:12 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

How about we just bring back dueling and see what happens after that?


99 posted on 10/04/2012 1:17:46 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

It’ll be like the last time we had dueling. Older men will fall to brash and younger opponents who have better eyes, quicker reflexes, stronger muscles and all the other benefits of youth to win physical contests. The real history of dueling isn’t as romantic as the fantasy.


100 posted on 10/04/2012 1:26:10 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson