To: sickoflibs; flaglady47; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3
Does “I was completely wrong” mean that Romney’s 47% statement was politically inept, or that it was factually wrong? Is there is high correlation between those who pay no income tax and those who vote for Obama (for obvious reasons)?
19 posted on
10/04/2012 9:28:15 PM PDT by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; flaglady47; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3
RE :”
Does I was completely wrong mean that Romneys 47% statement was politically inept, or that it was factually wrong? Is there is high correlation between those who pay no income tax and those who vote for Obama (for obvious reasons)?”
I will let you ask Romney what he meant when he said it was ‘completely wrong’.
But how about seniors on social security (over 55 obviously ) and disabled veterans whose benefits are not income taxed, my brother is one. You really think Romney meant to call them moochers?
If your point was that Romney took a valid issue (too many moochers dependent) and screwed it up, I been trying to point that out for weeks.
20 posted on
10/04/2012 10:09:38 PM PDT by
sickoflibs
(Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; sickoflibs
I was completely wrong mean that Romneys 47% statement was politically inept, or that it was factually wrong? yes ???
how about just plain stupid to say unless the security guarantees a closed room ??? when the cool kids clique starts badmouthin the cheese and cracker crowd, always wise to make sure a 'meat & taters' type doesnt overhear ya and give you a swirlly...or worse...
21 posted on
10/04/2012 10:16:51 PM PDT by
Gilbo_3
(Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson