To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; flaglady47; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3
RE :”
Does I was completely wrong mean that Romneys 47% statement was politically inept, or that it was factually wrong? Is there is high correlation between those who pay no income tax and those who vote for Obama (for obvious reasons)?”
I will let you ask Romney what he meant when he said it was ‘completely wrong’.
But how about seniors on social security (over 55 obviously ) and disabled veterans whose benefits are not income taxed, my brother is one. You really think Romney meant to call them moochers?
If your point was that Romney took a valid issue (too many moochers dependent) and screwed it up, I been trying to point that out for weeks.
20 posted on
10/04/2012 10:09:38 PM PDT by
sickoflibs
(Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
To: sickoflibs; flaglady47; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3
If your point was that Romney took a valid issue (too many moochers dependent) and screwed it up, I been trying to point that out for weeks.Exactly! The reason I asked the question was that some are going to argue that Romney's 47% comment was at least partly accurate (but some who pay no income tax probably considered voting for R, until they heard what R said). I think it is obvious that even if R had been 100% factually correct, it was dumb to utter it in public. Sharron Angle again.
23 posted on
10/04/2012 11:22:12 PM PDT by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson