Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

“Actually they are mentally locked in the 11th century ~ that’s when the Turks took them over and turned all the Arabic, Berber and Kurdish speaking areas in the Middle East into an enormous tax farm.”

Dates, Muawiyah. The Turks prevailed against the Maluks and Persians in 1516. Until then, they were just a big power in Turkic-speaking regions. To be fair, the Mamluks and their predecessors were no big bargain, either.

They spent the next 600 years under the Turkish boot ~ and then finally some Europeans moved in to liberate them.

Please. The Europeans might have incidentally paved a road or two and built an occasional hospital, but the last thing on their minds was liberating anyone. They wanted oil. They wanted geopolitical hegemony. They wanted to screw each other. There were some Arabs in the area where they wanted hegemony, oil, and all that, and since there were a lot of them, they thought it wise not to screw them, but instead let them screw the Jooos! to whom they’d promised a homeland, but “liberate” the Arabs? They simply picked out which aristocratic families could screw which peasants, where. The Saudis got the Hijaz. The Husseinis got Iraq, “Trans-Jordan” and didn’t get what was left of Syria because the French got that, and their adolescent nephew Haj Amin al Husseini got Jerusalem, provided he incited enough anti-Jewish riots. Liberate? Please.


35 posted on 10/01/2012 3:14:41 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Eleutheria5
Good grief, get your dates correct yourself ~ the Seljuk Turks took it all over by 1200. Mongol rule overlaps and is coterminous with (and involved the same guys) as Turkish rule.

The specific cause of the Crusades was the Seljuk occupation of Egypt (and other places) and the cessation of the pilgrimages to the holy land, etc.

That's all 11th and 12th century stuff.

The Turks and the Europeans were not at all interested in the oil resources at the time.

Napoleon came with a number of ideas ~ from the French Revolution, over 200 years ago. That was before the internal combustion engine was a big deal. Actually trains were still a novelty.

Do not take 20th century issues with the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and extend them back into the 1700s and 1800s ~ it was a whole different game then, and the Arabs were not their own men at the time.

44 posted on 10/01/2012 3:49:25 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5; muawiyah

Actualy the Mamluks were Turkic in origin and the Ilkhanate Empire ruling Persia was Mongolic-Turkic


98 posted on 10/02/2012 5:44:21 PM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

Well,Napoleon wanted to gain control of Suez and cut the British off from India. Oil did not begin to come into the picture until after 1912, and that in a limited way. American was the world’s great oil producer until after WWII. In thr 19th Century the Euopean powers,, simply overwhelmed the old Turkish empire as they did the antique power of China.


122 posted on 10/03/2012 10:16:19 PM PDT by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Eleutheria5

Well,Napoleon wanted to gain control of Suez and cut the British off from India. Oil did not begin to come into the picture until after 1912, and that in a limited way. American was the world’s great oil producer until after WWII. In thr 19th Century the Euopean powers,, simply overwhelmed the old Turkish empire as they did the antique power of China.


123 posted on 10/03/2012 10:16:28 PM PDT by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson