The Times recommends Barack Obama for president, again (Obama's a failure but we endorse him anyway)

The Seattle Times ^ | September 29, 2012 | Seattle Times Editorial Board

[Junior_G]

In 2008, Barack Obama was The Seattle Times’ choice for president. Four years later, we endorse him again, with less enthusiasm. But he is a better choice than Mitt Romney, and could still go down in history as a good president...

[Junior_G]

Pathetic editorial from a city where the golden rule is vote Democrat, no matter what.

[Anitius Severinus Boethius]

A few more endorsements like that and President Obama’s campaign will be on a suicide watch. That was awful!

[death2tyrants]

we endorse him again, with less enthusiasm

But aren't they excited about getting a free Obamaphone?

[Gene Eric]

A healthy capitalistic society would strip the degenerate influence the Leftwing media has on a liberated America.

Let’s get healthy.

[okie01]

The Seattle Times doesn't seem to be excited about a second Obama term.

"A disappointment so far, but he still has promise..." is the best they can do?

[smoothsailing]

Oh wow, their boy beat them up and stole their money, but they still love him. Battered Editor Syndrome.

[garjog]

Well then. That settles it.

[Revolting cat!]

Can’t risk losing any more subscribers.

[Sarah Barracuda]

So basically they are saying that Obama sucks but Communism is just too good to pass up, hey maybe he will do better next time right Seattle Times?

[Junior_G]

I love this: "...and could still go down in history as a good president."

After one full term, they don't even think he can be considered a good president yet but they still endorse him.

[nutmeg]

Seattle Slimes ping...

[Jet Jaguar]

LOL!!!!!!

[radpolis]

If there is an institution in the US that is more despicable than the liberal media, I can’t think of it.

This is a conservative site and we all oppose liberalism, but any person looking at Obama objectively has to rule him a failure on the empirical evidence and even according to his own promises he made when he ran the first time.

[MacMattico]

What other President would have ever gotten an endorsement like that? No one! Basically he sucks, but the other guy MIGHT suck worse so vote vote for our guy. Yes, our guy because the msm realizes if you don't vote for the black leftist, you're racist. Their white liberal guilt tells them this is true and colors every story they write, so to speak.

[newzjunkey]

... could still go down in history as a good president

WOW! There's a ringing endorsement! In other words he s*cks!

[Nachum]

As Good as It Gets

“Sell crazy somewhere else...”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lOg8PzEaWs

[NJRighty]

From the article: In 2008, Obama promised to use the Federal Communications Commission to block the consolidation of the news media into a handful of giant corporations that threaten the functioning of our democracy. He has not done it.

Romney is not going to do it — but Obama still could.

So they endorsed him because he made a promise that he did not keep. Just brilliant.

[jmacusa]

Boy I’ll say! The Seattle Slimes could have just “Re-Elect Obama?’’ “We don’t think so but we doubt it’’.

[Mortrey]

Democrats are so stupid, they don’t even know they hate blacks:

http://www.nbra.info/DYK-HistoryTest

[gonzo]

"...After one full term, they don't even think he can be considered a good president yet but they still endorse him. ..."

GAD, that's funny! ....................................... FRegards