Posted on 09/29/2012 8:21:34 PM PDT by smoothsailing
“a conclusion that MIGHT be true but fir which there is no evidence to indicate WILL be true”
Okay, but why does erring in the side of caution always mean erring on the side of Democrats? Because of party affiliation? But they can’t judge when voters will jump parties, nor when turnout will be depressed, nor how indies will go. So they call it the best way they can, given their limitations. Sometimes they’re right, as when it’s painfully obvious in 08. And sometimes they miss it, as in 04, 10, or the Wisconsin recall.
My thinking is they don’t really try to predict the outcome, just be able to say they took all the precautions and followed the industry standards. So that we get this fantasy world of polls alongside the real world. And no one will care, because producing them and reporting them are done for their own sake, rather than for telling the future. So long as they’re not so far off should people remember they don’t have an excuse.
I’ve been making that point for weeks now. It’s just the denial phase. I think next will be anger at Romney. Then acceptance we lost.
My Chicago-based, Jewish friend and his Jewish wife, both lifelong Democrats who voted for Obama in 2008, are voting for Romney. Need I say more? Romney is going to win this election.
Today the party id is R+4.5 and the turnout will be D+4 with a stronger enthusiasm gap? I don’t think so. Makes no sense.
+++++++++++
I don’t think so either. I do believe that Raz needs to see that R+4.5 either hold or grow through September and October and at that point he will adjust his Turnout Model to be more favorable to our side.
But don’t forget, that R+4.5 is a high water mark for the GOP and it seems unlikely to be sustained through November 6. We don’t have the Rasmussen results for September yet but they should be out next week and I expect they will get a lot of attention here at FR.
In 2012, look for a re-run of 2008 when the parasites, self hating Whites, American haters, brainwashed and stupid youths joined forces to send an imposter to the White House. Come November 2012, look for the same bunch, along with obama's vote counters to keep him there.
“Though I am starting to see more O’Bumbler/Bonehead signs.”
I am struck by the fact that I am NOT seeing Obama signs or bumper stickers in Northern Virginia this time around. Yesterday, I ran errands all around western Fairfax County and eastern Loudoun - the Dulles area. I saw one Obama bumper sticker.
I know many government employees - black and white - who are embarrassed by Obama’s inept performance. Still, they will feel socially ostracized if they voice support for the GOP, or if they criticize Obama. My question is whether they will show up to vote for Obama.
The government union’s big issue is the pay freeze. AFGE is disseminating flyers that don’t mention Obama, but praise Reid and bash Boehner and the Republicans for supporting an extension of the Bush tax cuts. On the theory that increased taxes will get AFGE members the steady raises they are used to from the past. No mention that the Obama took away their raises as a political maneuver because he knows the union will support him regardless of what he does to them. No mention that govt employees did much better financially under Bush than under Obama.
There is a high level of interest across party lines in this first debate. People want to have their opinions validated. There is a percent of democrat voters, 2% - 5% who are persuadable. Romney’s team knows exactly who those voters are and will target them. If he gets even a portion of those and the majority of undecideds, he will win.
Totally agree with what I believe and have been saying for some time as well.
Obama has a lead. It is rather small, and can be overcome, but he currently has a lead. If the election were held today, he would win by a margin similar to GWB back in 2004.
Romney still has time to turn things around though. The public is still deeply unsatisfied with Obama overall, they currently just don’t see Romney as a better alternative.
The debates will tell a lot. The MSM has already written their stories about how Obama dominated the debates and Romney was poorly prepared and made numerous gaffes.
If the American people can get past that spin though and actually listen to what Romney has to offer, and if he can indeed lay out a compelling alternative vision, then he WILL be our next President.
Those are big “ifs”, but it can be done.
Good.
Let Obama/Soetoro have it.
There is NO WAY out of 16 Trillion in only the public debt! That and 150 TRILLION in unfunded mandates too!
Think of the passengers on the Titanic voting for a Captain, only difference is one wants to go full speed ahead and the other wants to drop it to half speed.
Obama/Soetoro will be know as the man who crashed the entire US economy and will probably either be arrested, flee offshore or become dictator and I say BRING IT ON!
*Puff, puff, pant, pant, drool*
“Obama’s ahead! He’s gonna win!! We in the mainly slimy media are just waiting for his giant October Surprise to clench the deal!!! It’s gonna be a doozy!!!!”
*Puff, puff, pant, pant, drool*
No Republican calls Romney “Mittens”
I think he’s underpolling what I like to call the “pizzed off effect” which is going to pump up the GOP percentage significantly.
Nice thread.
mark...
I don’t think Romney is ahead, but this idea that pollsters long for credibility and accuracy is ludicrous, based on their not calling the 08 race bu the correct margin. The only pollster to do that was Ras. Several other pollsters were, 4, 5 and even 6 points off.
FYI
Rasmussen has been a registered
democrat since Jimmy Carter!
According to Wikipedia quoting Rasmussen himself, he was raised in Republican household, migrated to dems after Nixon debacle, and now is independent; If you read entire quote, you can see that he really is very likely NOT a democrat.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Rasmussen
~Speaking about his political views, Rasmussen said, “I was brought up loosely as a Republican, but at our family dinner table we talked about the important politics of the New York Giants and the New York Yankees. There was no political discussion in my life growing up. I became a Democrat after Richard Nixon and into the Jimmy Carter era and have been an Independent ever since. I spoke today about how the American people were skeptical about politicians—well, I’m more skeptical. I really do see the core issue as the political class versus mainstream voters. I think that is a much bigger gap than Republican, Democrat, conservative, or liberal.”[2]~
My county is 2 to 1 Democrats advantage for most elections. Last election, Obama only won by 4 votes.
I have not seen one single Obama sign - not one. Several Romney/Ryan signs on display.
In spite of the Democrat leanings our community is full of bitter clingers to guns and religion. I expect Romney/Ryan to win. Huge number of union worker support though.
“Okay, but why does erring in the side of caution always mean erring on the side of Democrats? “
I think there are two reasons. First is that what history says. Since and including 1984, the average partisan breakdown for all elections was D+2.5. Ras is just using the historical average, which is a reasonable assumption.
I think the second is credibility. He’s a businessman. Being unusually wrong in this business is far more damaging than being unusually correct is beneficial. And, let’s face it, the Dems are better at pressuring media outlets, so being unusually wrong in favor of Republicans is even MORE damaging.
Ras is using a D+2.5 model while everyone else is using a D+7 or more model. There is zero evidence suggesting a historic Democratic wave, so Scott Rasmussen can be very confident that the turnout will be no more D than D+4 (2008 is the only time that EVER happened since Reagan was elected). Which means he’s pretty much guaranteed to have the closest turnout model. If he’s right, he’s the King of the Pollsters for nailing it. If he’s wrong and this election is even or has more Rs, he’s still far and away the closest and he’s STILL the King of the Pollsters. If he’s wrong and turnout equals the most Democratic it ever was other than 2008, he’s STILL the closest and is STILL the King of the Pollsters.
Basically, with a D+2.5 split, he’s guaranteed to be the closest under any normal circumstances AND has rock solid non-partisan justification for his model. If he models on an R+4, he opens himself up to risk of being a partisan hack and lowers his chances of being the closest. It’s kinda like the Price is Right strategy of betting one dollar more than the previous person.
If Dems have had the advantage since 84 why have they lost four out of seven presidential elections? Firstly because that’s only an average, but also because party advantage by itself is not predictive. There are various other factors, many if them measurable. Pollsters rely on that one because as you say it is considered more objective and less controversial. Which is why I say they live in an alternate reality.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.