You can take all the misguided impressions you want. Your data are so four years ago and hold no sway in this case.
This isn’t about “Obama”; it is about a tax code that is fundamentally bent and ‘progressive’ that allows a major portion of the citizens of this country to LEGALLY pay no federal income taxes at all for the benefits thereof they receive.
My post qualified that if she was not a NET taxpayer (Federal Income tax), then she was not paying what I’d say is her fair share. In other words, any benefit she receives from being a national citizen is paid for by someone else - that part of the Federal cost is not borne by her.
That’s okay if it is voluntarily given by the rest, but it is not. The money for her support, however intangible is paid for by others (if she does not, in fact, pay ANY federal income taxes).
Your desire to raise taxes is the wrong idea, your entire clinging to the ridiculous idea of a neat little 47% is wrong.
I almost wonder if your income group was one that voted for Obama.