Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I am (Not) the 47% ( I did not choose my tax bracket )
American Thinker ^ | 09/28/2012 | Linda B.

Posted on 09/28/2012 9:34:47 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

I can't take it anymore! It's time to set the record straight:

I am, officially and categorically, in the infamous 47% tax bracket. You know, the one everybody assumes are moochers, users and takers. The main factor that has not been incorporated into the argument is choice. As you cannot choose your tax bracket, I did not and cannot choose mine.

What I pay doesn't and shouldn't brand my integrity.

Both parties have liberally slathered my character as a usable calculation to their cause. Do the Democrats think that by dangling 'freebie carrots' they have my vote? Why do the Republicans write me off as a lost cause due to my eligibility for entitlement programs? It is our choices not our 'classes' (an old Soviet term) that define us.

I was gathering signatures on the petition to recall Gray Davis. Before the Tea Party emerged on the public scene, I was an attendant at the "Heads On A Stick" rallies hosted by John & Ken (local LA talk show hosts) protesting corrupt California politicians. I emerged with the Tea Party as I rallied at various representative townhalls protesting against Obama Care and standing shoulder-to- shoulder against SEIU paid thugs to keep us at distance.

I have never filed or used food stamps - I shop wisely.

I do not claim extra dependents on my tax forms for more deductions. I do not file 'earned income tax credits' where I would get a hefty check from the government come year's end. If you're not familiar with it, look it up. It will make your blood boil! I do not use the emergency room even when I've been advised to go. Amazing how I didn't need the stitches that everyone so adamantly assured me were necessary.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 47; romney; tax; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: Fightin Whitey

Are they Christians?

Normally I wouldn’t be concerned about their religious associations, but more and more I’m discovering many libs lack the essential value of honesty towards themselves. They no longer pay attention to the welfare of their souls but only to the plumpness of their bank accounts.

These folks do not do anything illegal, but they are not nice folks.

Frankly, the couple sounds like my cousin and her husband in Long Beach. They both have businessess and own multiple residences. They are flaming liberals. I do not talk with them, as it is like dealing with people from another planet.


61 posted on 09/28/2012 12:15:32 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
I am curious how many FReepers are part of the blanket 47%.

Gee, I'm not sure if I am or not...why don't You tell Me

I receive a pension, SS and Medicare(b). I pay Fed and state income taxes on my pension and on part of my SS. I pay a monthly premium for my Medicare (b). I no longer pay real estate taxes (homestead exemption) but I do pay county personal property taxes. My income from SS is greater than my fed, state and county taxes combined.

Where do I fall?

62 posted on 09/28/2012 12:27:47 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
As you cannot choose your tax bracket,

Wrong, Linda. If your tax bracket is too high, all you need to do is make less money. Work less hard. Don't take risks! Because, if you lose, you lose, but if you win, the government confiscates the proceeds.

Of course, guess what that type of action does to the economy and to Linda's chances of rising out of the 47%.

63 posted on 09/28/2012 12:38:31 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
Income taxes were never meant to be paid by the majority of US citizens.

That is extremely bad public policy.

64 posted on 09/28/2012 12:45:48 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

>>Are they Christians?”

That’s a really smart question.

Actually they loathe anything that has to do with what they call “established religion”. They are the first to lodge protests (and this is in a small town) when the school mentions God in a play or ceremony.

I have heard hints that there were some bad experiences at the hands of clergy far in the past but that could be just Jesus-hating too.

They are not rich or flashy people, although they like to associate with them. I am forever telling one of the pair that sooner or later they will vote Republican, or at least acknowledge their conservatism, because they work very hard and run good small businesses.

I know that it is our wretched tax system in part that eases their way toward doing what they do...I’m frankly just tired of pulling the load for them and many who are far, far worse than they.


65 posted on 09/28/2012 12:52:40 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Roccus; whattajoke

PS...that’s a NON-government pension


66 posted on 09/28/2012 12:53:40 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey; SatinDoll

“Liberalism” is the political manifestation of the religion of humanism, which is, in essence, Satanism.

No, liberals aren’t “Christian” in their religious practices.


67 posted on 09/28/2012 12:54:53 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; sickoflibs; NFHale; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; Impy; stephenjohnbanker
I guess I could choose to contribute more taxes to the government, but would you? I won't give California or D.C. one red cent more to squander!

Interesting argument. Some in the "47%" voted against the redistributionists, but paying extra tax for the govt. to waste does not do any good.

Romney would like to take his 47% statement back, obviously. It may cost him votes from the right and center.

68 posted on 09/28/2012 2:30:44 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
“only the very wealthy should pay income taxes and they should only pay a pittance”.

The problem is that people who don't pay don't have any qualms about raising taxes on those who do. So the result is that the tax will never be a pittance.

Mind you, people who don't pay income taxes do in fact pay taxes, they just don't always realize that they do. Raise taxes on the rich and it just gets rolled into the cost of doing business and you pay it when you buy your gallon of milk at the store. Or your gallon of gas at the pump.

So people are kidding themselves when they think they can shift the tax to the very rich because it comes right back to them either directly in the price of goods or indirectly when their brother-in-law can't find a job.

So I've usually favored a flat tax, with an amount equivalent to the minimum wage tax free. Every dollar after whatever that first amount is, taxed the same whether its $1 or $1000000. That way everyone has skin in the game when it comes to choosing a fair tax rate.

Or, alternatively, lower the income tax rate to the same as the capital gains rate. Now Romney and his secretary both pay 15%.

69 posted on 09/28/2012 2:33:24 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: History Repeats

I don’t think you understand the difference between different kinds of taxes. SS tax is not income tax. sales tax is not income tax. Property tax is not income tax. Fuel tax is not income tax. This thread is about income taxes ONLY.


70 posted on 09/28/2012 4:14:54 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson