Posted on 09/27/2012 3:58:37 PM PDT by Windflier
I wonder what all of the geniuses who were having orgasms when the con man from KOLOB picked this retard for VP have to say about this.
DC and the Washingtonians are the problem and never will be the solution.
Just 2 factions fighting over who gets to control the cash extorted by the IRS from us suckers outside the Beltway
As a proud member of the ABO fan club, they have my vote because they’re not Kenyan dog-eating commies and they’re the only ones right now who have a shot at winning, but that’s pretty much where my loyalty ends.
If they win and they send Obama to the C-SPAN circuit in disgrace, I have every intention of rolling up my sleeves against R/R if they stray one iota from restoring the Republic and the Limited Government We the People deserve.
Like an absolute moron, I was silent during the Bush years. (Despite the fact I didn’t vote for him. I was probably the only person in South Florida who willfully voted for Pat Buchanan. It’s OK to laugh at that, I was young and incredibly stupid. It was what our Dear Leader calls “a teachable moment.”) I felt that it was of utmost importance to support the Commander in Chief during a time of war, and while I didn’t support Bush (or his dad, for that matter) initially, at least he had Cheney, who I liked a great deal at the time. (But no longer because of his view on homosexual “marriage”.)
Then along came 2006 and W went all schizo and lefty-like. I will always thank him for fighting the War on Terror the way it should be fought, but I will NEVER, EVER forgive him for TARP or Medicare Part D. (But needless to say, I’d take W over the Kenyan Usurper in the White House every day of the week and twice on Sunday.)
But then again, what do I know ?
:)
I’m at the point now that I don’t trust ANY politician fully. I now vote knowing full well that I have to keep both peepers on them at all times, regardless of whether their baseball cap has an -R or a -D on it.
Nah. Why bother? I'll just follow your example and tear down the only option we have of beating Obama. Maybe I'll even go one better and not even vote.
So I take it you agree with Paul Ryan's stance on gays in the military?
I doubt that you do, so why don't you knock of the drama and simply confront the fact that PAUL RYAN, the Republican candidate for Vice President said this, and not me?
GOPE BITCH
I doubt that you do, so why don't you knock of the drama and simply confront the fact that PAUL RYAN, the Republican candidate for Vice President said this, and not me?
Have you seen Dinesh D'Souza's movie, "2016"? We can't afford to eat our own this time, Windflier. It's not "drama"; it's reality. Did you listen to or read Netanyahu's speech today? Have you seen coverage of the rioting in Greece and Spain? That will be the U.S. if Obama is re-elected. I find economic and security issues far more important than what Paul Ryan says about DADT right now.
So are the words out of PAUL RYAN'S own mouth. Now, are you going to keep making me responsible for saying them? The guy is giving field advantage to the enemy. Get a grip and realize that.
PAUL RYAN is the one doing the damage here - not me.
We used to bash Romney and his fellow liberals in Taxachusettes. Now, the RINOs, here and in the RNC, embrace him.
I know. I watched it happen, and can still hardly believe what I'm seeing. Time was, you could get banned from FR for saying anything supportive about Romney. My, how times have changed.
Mark my words, though. Romney's going to make a lot of conservatives rue the day they tossed away their principles to support him.
Do you have any idea of the size of the party in the Obama campaign if Ryan had said he wanted to reinstate DADT?
They'd be beside themselves with joy; nothing but high fives as they went into the office tomorrow morning.
This just shows Ryan is a far wiser politician than someone like Akin.
I see. So it's better for our candidates to please the left, than to speak unequivocally for us - the people who will vote them into office.
Got it.
Exhibit A, as to why the Republican party is dying. They stand for nothing, and no one, except gaining political power by whatever means necessary. Even if it means stabbing their constituents in the back.
Thanks for explaining that. I feel much better now.
You will not defeat Romney-Ryan on an even playing field. They took care of that eventuality in the convention with the rules changes.
ACTUALLY, your answers are leftist homosexual agenda promoting propaganda!
The speed bump looks a little lower every day.
We have this article, and I'm also hearing R&R say we can't cut defense spending and that their spending plans are revenue neutral.
If we lose this election, we might have to seriously consider beginning a secession movement. Otherwise, we’ll end up like Greece in more ways than one.
Well he sure is taking the bloom off the rose for me.
I understand your point. We have a major **HETEROSEXUAL** problem in the military, too. It is a significant factor in the rapes and sexual misconduct of male soldiers toward female soldiers and off-post civilian women.
It is not just the male soldiers, either. I just recently got done writing about a sex and alcohol party hosted by a female NCO in her late thirties for her daughter and about 20 other males and females, most if not all underage. Sexual immorality, if not stopped stateside, leads to the kind of things that blow up in the international media when soldiers commit sex crimes overseas.
For whatever it's worth, hard work by the ministerial alliance outside Fort Leonard Wood has shut down all but two of the five strip clubs that were here a decade ago, have gotten adult entertainment ordinances passed in the cities outside both the West Gate and Main Gate to make it all but impossible to open another one inside city limits, and in cooperation with law enforcement, have shut down all but one of the whorehouses. (The last one is a Korean sex trafficking operation and has been an **EXTREMELY** difficult ring to crack.)
It is possible to deal with these problems, even with our Supreme Court's twisted reinterpretation of the Constitution, but it is very, very hard.
You are wrong. Enjoy the bliss of ignorance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.