Skip to comments.
CREWS: Homosexuals in the military demand special privileges
Washington Times ^
| Tuesday, September 25, 2012
| Col. Ron Crews
Posted on 09/25/2012 10:04:09 PM PDT by brityank
CREWS: Homosexuals in the military demand special privileges
Toleration doesnt cut both ways
The American armed forces exist to defend our nation, not to conduct social science lab experiments in which our troops serve as human subjects. Try telling that to this administration.
The first anniversary of the repeal of Dont Ask, Dont Tell, Sept. 20, has come and gone. Now, there is mounting evidence that proves our warnings were not idle chatter. The threat to freedom posed by this radical sexual experiment on our military is real: It is grave and it is growing.
Activists inside and outside our government who pushed the repeal have deployed a smoke screen around the fact that once the military was forced to exalt homosexuality in the ranks, the all-too-foreseen consequence reared its ugly head.
++++++++++++++++
The Navy has allowed sailors openly engaged in homosexual behavior to choose their bunkmates. Imagine in this new age of tolerance if a sailor asked to be moved from a close-quarters berthing area because of his concern about another sailors sexual appetites. We already know what would happen, because tolerance has never been a two-way street.
Obviously, the recent study (aka propaganda) claiming that the repeal went off without a hitch should be shredded post-haste. It has no connection to reality.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: celebrateperversity; conductcode; cultureofcorruption; dadt; fags; gaybunkmates; gaymilitary; greatdestroyer; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; marxistcoup; notbreaking; obamalegacy; obamunism; sexualharassment; thedestroyers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141 next last
To: brityank
What’s next...uniforms with built in buttplugs?
121
posted on
09/28/2012 8:47:27 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: jazusamo
same here.
How on earth could anyone on this site write such utter crap.
Why is it that the left and the homostapo and their supporters also think that it is just Christians who do not go with their agenda, could it be that they need an enemy to further their agenda and raise more olney for the leaders of the homostapo?
I do not go to church, my church left me, I and my family know many who do not go to church but they sure as hell does nor agree with the queers agenda or even what qeers do to each other
122
posted on
09/28/2012 9:00:57 AM PDT
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: manc; INVAR; Heff
I believe INVAR said it much better than I.
However, for any FReeper to use this site to try to convince people, whether religious or not, to accept homosexualism or to normalize it in any manner is just flat wrong and Heff has been here long enough to know better.
123
posted on
09/28/2012 9:12:58 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
("Intellect is not wisdom" -- Thomas Sowell)
To: who_would_fardels_bear
Are you kidding me? How are a bunch of poofers and mal contents going to control anyone? As far as illegals are concerned they will have to change the recruiting regs for them to enlists. Might happen but I do not think Americans will put up with it it.
124
posted on
09/28/2012 10:18:45 AM PDT
by
Americanexpat
(�It is going to get even worse now that the)
To: eater-of-toast
“...I never liked M*A*S*H even as child, mostly because of my visceral disgust for crossdressing.”
So you’ve never watched a Bugs Bunny cartoon either? Bugs was quite a crossdresser in his early days.
125
posted on
09/28/2012 10:51:29 AM PDT
by
Owl558
("Those who remember George Satayana are doomed to repeat him")
To: Owl558
I don’t believe I ever saw any of those early ones. If I had, no doubt I’d rise up against them like the Legion of Decency. lol
126
posted on
09/28/2012 5:41:03 PM PDT
by
eater-of-toast
("It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones." --Calvin Coolidge)
To: ohioman
Let’s ask those currently serving. Something the author of this piece obviously didn’t bother to do. Am still waiting for anyone to put on the big boy pants and provide sources for the outlandish claim.
127
posted on
09/28/2012 8:02:36 PM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
To: manc
So what animals do in nature is unnatural? LOL
I’m not saying that just because animals do it we should too. I mean, animals also indulge in cannibalism, but to try to throw science into the argument is laughable.
128
posted on
09/28/2012 8:15:16 PM PDT
by
turn_to
To: jazusamo
129
posted on
09/28/2012 11:20:54 PM PDT
by
Heff
(Half this country is that stupid.)
To: brityank
www.sapr.mil which reports sexual misconduct/assault data in the miliary has data that shows that same sex attacks have increased dramatically since the repeal of DADT. Same sex misconduct among homosexuals was already occurring a greatly increased rate when compared to the same size of the homosexual population in the military. Heterosexual misconduct accounts for most situations but that is because the vast majority of recruits are heterosexual. Homosexuals are as much as 3x-8x more likely to be involved in sexual misconduct than their heterosexual counterparts based on analysis of the military data the variance of course depends on how many gays are really in the military. Will anyone point this out or dare do the analysis. Probably not. The repeal of DADT was about one thing and that is a radical transformation of the military which is one of the last major engines producing patriots with a more conservative bent. Also minorities who are in the military are more likely than civilians to vote GOP. This is why the left has targetted the military and of course we have those among us who choose to ignore this pretending as if it is no big deal. Most who feel that way are just willfully ignorant.
130
posted on
09/29/2012 5:07:54 PM PDT
by
Maelstorm
(Now lets return to our regular scheduled deprogramming.)
To: TurboZamboni
Whod have guessed there would come a day when the Boy Scouts had tougher standards than the military?
Nathan Muir: I take it you didn't get to be a marksman putting food on your mama's table.
Tom Bishop: No, sir. We have a Safeway back home.
Nathan Muir: Where'd you learn to shoot?
Tom Bishop: Boy scouts, sir.
Nathan Muir: What, are you kidding me?
Tom Bishop: No, sir.
Yep.
131
posted on
09/30/2012 7:42:21 AM PDT
by
TArcher
To: KantianBurke
You STILL did not answer my question. Do you think open faggotry has a detrimental effect on our military?
- I think you are a closet lib who comes to FR to stir up trouble.
132
posted on
10/02/2012 9:46:27 AM PDT
by
ohioman
To: ohioman
And no one is answering mine - the author of this pathetic article makes a very bold claim - where’s his sources or proof? It’s telling you’re stooping to name calling those who have the temerity to want some answers. Regardless the conclusion is clear - the author made up the claim to get folks’ blood boiling. Fall for it if you want. The rest of us on planet Earth will ignore falsehoods and those who peddle them.
133
posted on
10/02/2012 12:34:42 PM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
To: KantianBurke
WTF? I have never called you a name? Are you going to tell your mommy on me?
134
posted on
10/03/2012 5:58:33 AM PDT
by
ohioman
To: ohioman
“- I think you are a closet lib who comes to FR to stir up trouble.”
You’re either in possession of a terrible memory or are a bad liar. I’m going with the latter. Makes sense considering your irritation that someone is asking for verification on a story.
135
posted on
10/03/2012 1:47:24 PM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
To: KantianBurke
Whatever dude. All you do is deflect my questions which only serves to shine a light on the fact that you are most likely 100% behind fags in the military. Go cry about it over at DU maybe someone there will give a damn.
136
posted on
10/04/2012 5:39:45 AM PDT
by
ohioman
To: ohioman
And all you do is avoid direct questions or acknowledging when you’ve been called out. And the whole issue doesn’t even involve your obsession over gays - its questioning claims made against our military.
137
posted on
10/04/2012 3:35:35 PM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
To: GeronL
That is correct. A few days ago Ryan admitted that a Romney administration would not try to repeal the repeal of DADT.
To: KantianBurke
At least you have made it clear that you are 100% for the homo agenda. I hope your days on FR are numbered.
139
posted on
10/05/2012 5:25:56 AM PDT
by
ohioman
To: ohioman
You’re the one who get let the gay issue go. Methink you doth protest too much.
140
posted on
10/05/2012 4:58:06 PM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson