Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Genoa
But it would have been a foolish decision politically.

I don't dispute that this is one reason it wasn't done. But it was NOT the legal reasoning.

Lincoln wanted to end slavery. Lost causers want to argue he only wanted to save the Union ("at all costs"). Actually he (and all Republicans) wanted both. And while it is true that they wanted to save the Union more, that fact is too often used to support a claim that Lincoln "didn't want to end slavery," or that the primary cause of the Civil War was not slavery. Neither of those statements is true.

27 posted on 09/25/2012 5:50:56 PM PDT by FredZarguna ("The future does not belong to those who do not eat bacon.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: FredZarguna
We agree! Lincoln did want to end slavery, and the existence of slavery was the precipitating cause of the chain of events that led to the outbreak of hostilities.

Can we also agree that Obama is a fraud and a fiasco?

32 posted on 09/25/2012 6:07:18 PM PDT by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson