Utah's electoral votes are safely in the bag for Romney, that should be safe to assume.
Meanwhile, what have we got here? Elsie, just one more loveable harmless goofball, posting on FreeRepublic. Nothing to get upset over. Ok, he has a thing against Mormonism. He's not alone.
Nonetheless, I think folks here (who are here as much as anything because they DO hold strong political viewpoints) if they are in battleground States, will vote for the Republican nominee, regardless of the grumbling by a few of us here (including myself).
if the man does make it.. I would like to see some overturning of much of what Obama has done on an "Executive" basis. For example -- the Keystone XL pipeline extension. Identify the few trouble spots, do what is necessary to preclude possible harm to the groundwater tables in key areas, from potential future leaks ---even it meant double-walling certain sections with pipe big enough for an inspector to easily move around in--- then GET IT BUILT.
Take the "Dream Act" put into effect by Obama against the will of Congress, and require States to add a modifier or indicator on every driver license issued under the provision of the Act, that the holder of said license was not eligible to VOTE. Maybe force States to build a data-base of such individuals that both political parties can access compared to voter rolls. In the very least, something, anything that would work to preclude such driver's licenses and work permits to equal full citizenship "rights". related issue, food-for-thought FR thread Ease of getting voter IDs at the center of Commonwealth Court hearing
The list could go on. Another first item of business,(oil/energy policies again) would be to go through the EPA with a fine-toothed comb.FR thread "The EPA’s Arrogance and Incompetence Keeps America Dependent on Foreign Oil"
Critics of that sort of thing will undoubtedly say it would be done for political reasons. Answer them, "yes, that's right. It's being done to take the politics OUT of the science, and move towards actually science neutrality. Moving this nation towards energy independence is absolutely crucial for it's economic and security interests." Period.
Would Romney Move on such things, and other issues? Maybe, but he has a record of making too nice with the likes of the environmental lobby, folding his tent too soon, in an apparent(?) effort to "be liked".
Perhaps there are some close-to-Romney, Mormon MoFo's out there, snooping on pathetic FR threads. Am I singing to the choir? (on energy issues). If so, light a fire under your boy's butt, would you?
HMMMmmm...
I doubt this will happen.
Neither one of the two MAIN presidential candidates are going to be doing much singing to the choir.
The SATBs had their minds made up LONG ago!
What you'll hear until November will be deception, lies, promises, and propaganda from BOTH sides to try to influence the UNDECIDEDs who slither among us.