Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TurboZamboni

you know, doctors put their pants on one leg at a time. But the patients want a perfect result.


2 posted on 09/24/2012 6:02:24 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yldstrk

This is NOT about falling short on perfection!

This is about a system where nobody double checks ANYTHING!

As they assume somebody else checked.

I’m 6-1, 180, and workout with 200 lb. benchpress, and yet nearly died twice in hospitals in the last 5 years.

Once from staph infection and the other from a poor post colonoscopy cauterization, nearly bleeding to death.


3 posted on 09/24/2012 6:09:37 AM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk
But the patients want a perfect result.

Are you sure it's always the patient who wants the perfect result? When I was hospitalized for a heart condition, the doctors and the institution ran up a $30,000 bill of work that an insurance lawyer I consulted later analyzed were not required. When I met with the hospital administrator and the primary doctor about the report, they said that they had to do those tests because of malpractice lawsuits families brought when they didn't do ETKTM -- every test known to man.

My father died of a hospital-borne infection. My mother had been a candy-striper at that hospital for years, and knew that the cross-infection rate was low. Our decision not to go after the doctors and hospital were met with skeptical disbelief on their part, so they were not willing to discuss what happened candidly. So the fear of the lawyers and juries affected the doctor/family relationship. Investigation into the root cause? Crickets. I believe that adhering to best medical practice should be as ironclad a defense in reality as the (mistaken) belief that truth is the perfect defense against defamation. I like the idea of video records, "open" charting, and more participation by the patient in his or her care and the decisions thereto. I would also like to see waivers be available so that people wishing to get the BEST care can say "I promise to keep the lawyers out of it if you promise to keep Dr. Death out of it, too."

Report cards? Also an idea worth investigating, although I'd be careful about too much information to the general public -- too few people have the willingness to learn the basics before trying to make decisions. "Sips of knowledge intoxicate the mind, while deeper drinking sobers it again."

Where I think report cards would be the most useful is when doctors can review the candidates when referring patients to specialists. Currently, that's done with "the old boys club";a more fact-based system would be preferable. Just a thought.

12 posted on 09/24/2012 6:31:00 AM PDT by asinclair (Curing the sickness, not adding to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

Did you read the article?


18 posted on 09/24/2012 6:51:22 AM PDT by GalaxyAB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk
I found out from a front page article in the New York Times that the blood I was given in 1991 was never tested for HepC. That's not “perfection,” that's minimal competency.
31 posted on 09/24/2012 7:56:19 AM PDT by Excellence (9/11 was an act of faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

When imperfect results wind up with you dead you have a pretty solid reason to demand perfection.


36 posted on 09/24/2012 9:20:15 AM PDT by discostu (Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson