Romney says his campaign doesn’t need a ‘turnaround’

Yahoo News—The Ticket ^ | September 23, 2012 | Holly Bailey

[Olog-hai]

Mitt Romney insisted his campaign is not in need of a "turnaround" in spite of polls showing President Barack Obama expanding his lead in battleground states.

In an interview with CBS's "60 Minutes," the Republican presidential nominee rejected criticism from conservative pundits who have called his campaign incompetent.

"It doesn't need a turnaround," Romney insisted, pointing to national polls that have him "tied" with Obama. "I've got a very effective campaign. It's doing a very good job." …

[nicmarlo]

Um, no, that quote came from this thread.

I usually post on multiple threads, and was on this one earlier as well, just like you.

I have freedom of mobility on FR, just like you and the other anti-Romneyites

[mkjessup]

That is ansel12’s m.o., claims of ‘stalking’.
He just accused me of doing the same on another thread, and pinged a moderator with that accusation.

Of course he did. That little guttersnipe can dish it out, but he sure can't take it. He's just not packing the gear.

[nicmarlo]

For you to whine about 'personal attacks' is laughable considering that the only thing you post are personal attacks on ROMNEY!

You are condemned by your own words.

Exactly right, mk.

[nicmarlo]

That little guttersnipe can dish it out, but he sure can't take it. He's just not packing the gear.

None of them can. They become irrational and hysterical. (Oops...I guess I'm not allowed to say 'irrational' because I said that on another thread to him. LOL)

[mkjessup]

Here you are dragging one thread over to another, you really need to separate threads, and not carry personal baggage from thread to thread.

You consistently drag your personal Romney-hating baggage from thread to thread to every thread you visit, what's the difference? You just want to spew your bile and not be called out on it. In other words, 'free speech for thee, but not for me' (or anyone else who doesn't hate Romney like you do).

[mkjessup]

Frustration with their magic underwear wearer not doing so well expressed in the form of attacks on other members here.

Anti-Mormon Bigot much?

[nicmarlo]

You consistently drag your personal Romney-hating baggage from thread to thread to every thread you visit, what's the difference? You just want to spew your bile and not be called out on it. In other words, 'free speech for thee, but not for me' (or anyone else who doesn't hate Romney like you do).

Isn't the short word for that 'hypocrite'? Yes, I do believe so.

[Revolting cat!]

Thank you too much for illustrating my point.

[mkjessup]

You brought up the whole ‘magic underwear’ slur, only an anti-Mormon bigot would do that. Thank YOU for demonstrating your own intolerance and bigotry.

[diamond6]

Everything you just said is correct, except the part about him being a “default” Obama supporter. He is a blatant Obama supporter masquerading as a “concerned conservative.”

This is a troll, he is the devil from hell, and he has been repeating this same “concerned” Washington elite media mantra crap for I don’t know how long. All you have to do is look at how many posts he’s posting on the same exact talking points every single day to know he is as phony as a three dollar bill.

Don’t believe a word that he is saying.

[ansel12]

Try to separate freerepublic discussions about public figures, world figures, and presidential candidates, from personal attacks on fellow freepers.

[Revolting cat!]

Thank you for not ever addressing the points of the thread and for attacking others and thus discouraging readers from voting for your Mormon hero! With fans like you who’d want to vote for this guy!

[mkjessup]

[mkjessup]

Try to separate freerepublic discussions about public figures, world figures, and presidential candidates, from personal attacks on fellow freepers.

TRANSLATION = AGREE WITH ANSEL12 OR IT IS A PERSONAL ATTACK.

[ansel12]

You were too impolite to ping me, but I know that you can’t challenge me on any of my facts on Mitt Romney.

[nicmarlo]

Oh, I have and do.

You personally attack Mitt Romney and his wife at every opportunity, and thread. If an opportunity doesn’t arise, it’s created.

OTOH, you claim you’re being personally attack when a factual statement is posted about your comments.

[diamond6]

Impolite?

As Jesus said, “Go away. Be gone. Leave us!”

[mkjessup]

Thank you for not ever addressing the points of the thread and for attacking others and thus discouraging readers from voting for your Mormon hero! With fans like you who’d want to vote for this guy!

Once again el Revolto Feline, I have addressed a critical point of the thread, which is the consistent backstabbing attacks upon the Romney-Ryan ticket by dedicated, Romney-hating posters (which need not be named, as everyone certainly knows who they are by now), and I must say: don't even try that schoolyard game of "oh you said mean things, I won't vote for your friend for class president". And I note that you couldn't help yourself by including that phrase "Mormon hero" when the topic of Romney's religious beliefs was NEVER a point within this thread, so I shall conclude by saying "physician, heal thyself".

[Revolting cat!]

I’m afraid that some come here to prove to themselves (and they think to others) their own superiority. Attack, attack, attack, never address the topic of the posted article. Small, pitiful people.

[diamond6]

Ha, ha.

And to you as well...