Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Examiner Editorial:It's Official: Obama Raises Taxes On the Middle Class Breaking Campaign Promise
Washington Examiner ^ | September 20, 2012 | Staff

Posted on 09/21/2012 7:33:18 AM PDT by lbryce

On Wednesday, the Congressional Budget Office confirmed what we've been saying for years now: President Obama has broken his pledge not to raise taxes on the middle class. During his 2008 campaign, Obama promised Americans that he wouldn't raise taxes on anybody making less than $250,000 a year. Technically, he broke that pledge weeks after taking office, when he signed an increase in cigarette taxes, which fall disproportionately on those with lower incomes. Now, the CBO has released updated estimates showing that Obamacare's insurance mandate -- which the Supreme Court ruled to be a tax -- will hit millions of middle-class Americans.

In its report, the CBO determined the mandate tax would cost 6 million Americans a total of $7 billion in 2016, with a minimum payment of $695 apiece. The annual cost will then average about $8 billion from 2017 through 2022. The health care law requires Americans either to purchase government-approved insurance or to pay a penalty. The CBO estimates 30 million will be uninsured by that year, but most will be exempted from the mandate because they are unauthorized immigrants, members of Indian tribes or don't earn enough income to file taxes, among other reasons.

Among those who will have to pay a mandate penalty, 4.7 million will have incomes below 500 percent of the federal poverty level, according to the CBO, which is projected to be $60,000 for individuals and $123,000 for families of four by 2016.

The tax penalty, according to the CBO, is "the greater of: a flat dollar amount per person that rises to $695 in 2016 and is indexed by inflation thereafter (the penalty for children will be half that amount and an overall cap will apply to family payments); or a percentage of the household's income that rises to 2.5 percent for 2016 and subsequent years (also subject to a cap)."

Lest some of his defenders argue that Obama's campaign pledge merely pertained to income tax rates, here's what he actually said as a candidate in Dover, N.H., on Sept. 12, 2008: "I can make a firm pledge: Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase -- not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes."

As with many of Obama's "firm pledges," this one was a bit flimsy.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2008campaign; obama; taxes
In his own teleprompter-read words
YouTube:Obama Campaign 2008:President Obama's Pledge Never to Raise Taxes on Anyone Making Less Than $250,000 a Year

You won't hear the slightest reference from the MSM to Obama having broken his pledge not to
raise taxes on the middle class because he didn't use the phrase READ MY LIPS which otherwise
would have had the MSM frothing a the mouth about it 24/7/365.

1 posted on 09/21/2012 7:33:22 AM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

SHOCKING!


2 posted on 09/21/2012 7:39:50 AM PDT by kimchi lover ("I can see November from Wisconsin")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

And we got Clinton because bush1 broke his read my lips promise


3 posted on 09/21/2012 7:49:07 AM PDT by jonose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

the 6 million estimate of people to be taxed for not having insurance under the Obamacare mandate is likely to be far too low. I expect that many of the state health care exchanges will not be up and running when Obamacare kicks in and the Supreme Court decision this spring removed the federal mandate for states to expand their Medicare eligibility. This means that perhaps millions more Americans who lose their coverage when employers drop health insurance and they cannot afford to pay for a private policy will be hit with this tax. Basically these people will have no place to go if the exchanges are either not running or they cannot afford the coverage from the exchanges and they earn too much to be eligible for Medicaid.


4 posted on 09/21/2012 7:56:38 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Thanks for posting this. I was just trying to explain it to a clueless friend. Now I can read the story to him and watch as he scrambles for a lame excuse.


5 posted on 09/21/2012 7:59:21 AM PDT by airborne (MY HEROES DON'T WEAR CAPES. MY HEROES WEAR DOG TAGS ! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Some random thoughts:

- Regardless of whether you call it a tax or a penalty, the result is the same - a major increase in cost to the middle class. If Romney doesn’t hammer this, he is missing a golden opportunity.

- Wasn’t a major reason for “having” to institute a national health care system that we have to “help” those who didn’t have or couldn’t afford health insurance? Apparently, as was said at the time, there are a large number who don’t want or need it, or still can’t afford it.

- The truth is that everyone has healthcare - just ask all the illegals that go to the emergency room for a cold.

This is yet further proof that you can’t trust anything that comes out of the mouths of liberals!!!


6 posted on 09/21/2012 8:06:01 AM PDT by jda ("Righteousness exalts a nation . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson