Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vaquero

I read it as “Wall Street types would not blow their money on a top Republican as a lobbyist if the smart money was expecting a Democrat to win”


2 posted on 09/20/2012 7:46:19 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Buckeye McFrog

Good observation, Buckeye. Pawlenty was always about as interesting as watching paint dry. Romney has an ample number of advisors in that category as it is.


23 posted on 09/20/2012 8:14:20 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Ding Ding Ding....

Winner, Winner, Chicken Dinner.


26 posted on 09/20/2012 8:21:11 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Bingo. He has access to the internals.
39 posted on 09/20/2012 8:31:05 AM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature ($1.84 - The price of a gallon of gas on Jan. 20th, 2009.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog
“Wall Street types would not blow their money on a top Republican as a lobbyist if the smart money was expecting a Democrat to win”

Salient point.

55 posted on 09/20/2012 9:13:52 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (2008 + IN, NE1, NC, FL, VA, OH, IA = 272EV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog
I read it as "Wall Street types would not blow their money on a top Republican as a lobbyist if the smart money was expecting a Democrat to win"

I like your positive thinking!

78 posted on 09/20/2012 11:30:52 AM PDT by Churchillspirit (9/11/2001. NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog
I read it as “Wall Street types would not blow their money on a top Republican as a lobbyist if the smart money was expecting a Democrat to win”

I think that's a fair reading.

83 posted on 09/20/2012 12:11:50 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Election night is 47 days away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Tim, we hardly knew ye

Posted on September 20 2012 - 4:04 PM - Posted by: | Follow Doug on Twitter!

I’m not sure how to interpret this.

Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty has resigned as a national co-chairman of Republican Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign to lobby for Wall Street. He has also ruled out a run for governor or Senate in Minnesota in 2014.

The Financial Services Roundtable announced Thursday that Pawlenty will become its new president and chief executive officer on November 1. Pawlenty adviser Brian McClung told The Associated Press that Pawlenty ruled out the races as he prepared to take the job heading the Wall Street lobbying group.

“With this new position, Governor Pawlenty is taking off the table running for U.S. Senate or governor in 2014,” McClung said in an email. Pawlenty did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

Pawlenty was an early entrant in the Republican presidential campaign, but he ended his bid last year after a poor showing in the Iowa caucuses. He was also a finalist to be Romney’s vice presidential running mate.

I can think of four possibilities. In order of likelihood (least likely to most likely), they are as follows:

A) T-Paw believes Romney will win but won’t give him a plum job in his administration. This is hard for me to swallow. Pawlenty has been on board Team Mitt since he lost a straw poll to Michele Bachmann (remember her). And who can forget T-Paw’s the Iowa Straw Poll. And who can forget T-Paw’s refusal to confront Romney after his clever “Obamneycare” construction. Pawlenty had Mitt in his crosshairs over Romneycare and gave him a free pass without so much as a whimper. Mitt rewards loyalty (how else can we explain that incompetents like Andrea Saul and Eric Fehrnstrom still have jobs) and would certainly, in my opinion, have given T-Paw a prime job in his administration.

B) T-Paw was simply miffed at being “passed over” for the VP slot for the second time in as many elections. That can’t be good for the ego.

C) T-Paw, the self-described ”Sam’s Club Republican” has had a change of heart, and decided that he’d rather join that ”big triangle of greed” about which he once spoke rather than rail against it. Becoming a banking industry lobbyist offered him a symbolic and dramatic way to illustrate that change. Kind of like ripping the band aid off in one swift motion rather than slowly peeling it away.

D) Having seen the latest polling data and intrade trends – and the disarray inside the Romney camp — T-Paw has decided to flee the sinking ship while he could. He’s afraid that being associated with the Romney campaign will not be much of a resume enhancer … quite the opposite. (Think Steve Schmidt and the McCain campaign). The lobbying gig presented him with an irresistible life raft, so to speak, and T-Paw jumped into it head first.

Is there an option E that I missed? I’m open to possibilities.

114 posted on 09/20/2012 7:49:14 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Pawlenty?

Is that Looser still around?

He is just pissed He isn’t getting some sweet Position in the New Administration....


115 posted on 09/20/2012 7:53:50 PM PDT by LtKerst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

AWAKENINGS........................

http://whyichangedmyvote.com/

 

BEAUTIFUL TRUTH.......
SHARE THE GOOD NEWS!

120 posted on 09/20/2012 11:20:16 PM PDT by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson