Richard Nixon, 1968.
The GOP Controls the House and if it were to come down to Romney winning the popular vote while losing the Electoral College vote, the House would have to take actions to follow the wishes of the majority of the voters.
Didn’t this happen to W in 2000?
I read it that way too. It’s a code,,for the MSM
I saw NBC and immediately stopped reading.
The Community Agitators Formerly Known As ACORN can't generate enough election fraud to overcome the tsunami headed Ubama's way.
Notice how they cherry picked from the most leftwing polls and old polling to create this crappola.
Another leftist fantasy played out in print. Why do you never see articles about Romney winning the electoral college and losing the popular vote?
Wait this race is over how could Mitt be more popular than barry?
But, but....but the MSM have been saying that the election is over and the chair will win big time.
To me, this does not sound all that comforting from the media. This may be an early signal that they are seeing te chair is in big trouble.
When Suck-Up ABC starts switching stories from “Romney is Doomed” to stories like this, you know there’s a problem for Obama.
If You Live in a Blue State, Here Is What You Can Do To Help Romney Beat Obama
I've made 1600 phone calls from home to New Hampshire in the last six days using the system set up by the campaign. Even 100 calls will make a difference. Who will join me?
It all depends on who is counting the votes... remember?
“George W. Bush did it in 2000.”
Only because California went so overwhelmingly for Gore.
While Gore’s total popular vote over Bush was 500,000 votes, his margin in California alone was a couple of million.....
Do the math and you can see why the Dems are always talking about eliminating the Electoral College that essentially eliminates the effects of “piling on” in certain large population states.
Zero might just win if people vote third party or stay home because Romney isn’t “pure” enough for them.
There’s a clique of these cement-headed clowns right here on FR.
Imagine that...
What about that Popular vote movement, which now requires electors is some 10+ states to vote for the winner of the national polualr vote, REGARDLESS of the outscome of their respective state vote...they would change their mind faster than thos who supported the Hitler/Stalin pact.
Saying that George Bush failed to win the popular vote in 2000 ignores the rampant voting fraud all over the country that year. In countless precincts, more votes were counted than there were registered voters. In Florida, CBS (-and others?) called the election before the polls were closed, causing a quarter million Florida Republicans to stay home. We had the bizarre Carnahan trick in St. Louis of polling hours being extended (illegal, and clearly pre-planned). Plus, we must not forget that then-Vice President Gore sent out millions of voter registrations to non-citizens. NOBODY should accept the lie that Bush failed to win the popular vote in 2000. He won despite millions of illegally cast votes because Republicans stood their ground in Florida, waging a courageous battle of wills against the Democrat tyrant liars who were disputing chads, punching ballots from the backs of their cars and “finding” extra ballot boxes.
None of this matters, because the MSM told us that Romney lost the election last week and again on Monday. If he keeps on losing the election every few days, then he’ll wind up winning the popular vote but lose the electoral vote, or something.
If 90 percent of the commies and illegal aliens in NY and California vote Obama, he can pile up huge numbers of votes and easily win the popular vote. Who cares? The rest of us aren’t bound by the extreme liberalism of a few populous states. The nation was wisely set up to ensure that the president was elected by a broad swath of the nation.