Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why The 'Clinton' Recovery Is Unrepeatable
Zero hedge ^

Posted on 09/19/2012 6:42:41 AM PDT by Perdogg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Mr. K; Perdogg
There was no Clinton recovery. Business has cycles. Recessions are products of the business cycle. If the government does the wrong things a recession becomes bigger. I government leaves it alone it usually recovers on its own.
21 posted on 09/19/2012 7:26:01 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Corollary - Electing the same person over and over and expecting a different outcome is insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

“That period should probably be called “The Internet Recovery.” “

Bingo.... With the first mega IPO based on an idea (Netscape, and the browser wars), the dot-com kaboom was born. Less tangible than a housing boom, but substantial in its ability to generate capital (or at least the illusion of capital).

In other words, He Didn’t Build That! (he rode it.....”insert” off-color ribaldry here)

Slick willie also strengthened the CRA, continuing and expanding the home lending boom and its eventual collapse.

.02,
Your mileage may vary


22 posted on 09/19/2012 7:34:07 AM PDT by petro45acp (The question isn't "are you better off?" it should be "is it really the government's job?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

It wasn’t JUST the congress or the Republicans that saved us. It was a confluence of many things coming together into a perfect storm.

The BIG local story was the Dot-Com era and the creation of the internet at the same time as Clinton was in office. That drove a huge amount of the wealth creation of the time. That was a result of history being made, not really any policy coming out of D.C.

Further - the same invention of the internet, and the economic liberalization of two countries specifically, China and India who both chose to come into the modern world around that time has causes another perfect storm in reverse. The Job Suck to those places can be audibly heard around Silicon Valley. The reverberations of the movement of high-tech to other countries is still ringing here in Silicon Valley.

It is also easy to look back with 20-20 hind-site to say that there are some government policies that are making this drought endure! Let’s see - Sarbanes-Oxley and the change in IRS codes to consider stock grants as expenses on a startup’s ledger certainly have caused the Silicon Valley Golden goose to lay bricks instead of gold. The cost of energy & tax policies in CA haven’t helped either. The business in CA is stifling now.

In any case - it wasn’t JUST the Republican Congress. Let’s be honest - a balanced budget wouldn’t fix everything either. We live in a very different world than the “Gay 90’s ;-)”


23 posted on 09/19/2012 7:38:15 AM PDT by fremont_steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

it would require twelve years of Reaganomics to prepare the way


24 posted on 09/19/2012 7:38:52 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Dot Com explosion was the main cause for the growth - nothing else.


25 posted on 09/19/2012 7:42:09 AM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

The “Clinton recovery” can’t be repeated for multiple reasons, but one of the biggest is because during the Clinton years we had not yet maxed out the national credit card.


26 posted on 09/19/2012 7:52:15 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
During the election cycle of 1992, George H.W. Bush lost his job after Bill Clinton hammered him relentlessly for having caused the “worst economy of the last 50 years.”

In fact, as CNN’s Brooke Jackson has reported: “Three days before Christmas 1992, the National Bureau of Economic Research finally issued its official proclamation that the recession had ended 21 months earlier. What became the longest boom in U.S. history actually began nearly two years before Clinton took office.” See (See http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/10/31/jackson.recession.primer.otsc/).

By the same token, Clinton is generally perceived as having a stellar economic record during his own presidency, in spite of the fact that the economy was already starting to decline during the last year of his term after the stock market crashed in March 2000.

According to a report by MSNBC: “The longest economic expansion in U.S. history faltered so much in the summer of 2000 that business output actually contracted for one quarter, the government said Wednesday in releasing a comprehensive revision of the gross domestic product. Based on new data, the Commerce Department said that the GDP — the country’s total output of goods and services — shrank by 0.5 percent at an annual rate in the July-September quarter of 2000.” See: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3676690/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/t/gdp-figures-revised-downward/.

27 posted on 09/19/2012 7:54:17 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

THE TIME OF THE MAXIMUM PRODUCTIVITY OF THE BOOMER GENERATION!

Why does everyone ignore the elephant that was in the room, while today’s ‘negative productivity’ of the Boomers is well recognized?

We’re not going back to paying into SS and paying taxes on our incomes instead of taking from it- unless a time machine comes along...


28 posted on 09/19/2012 8:07:22 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

GREAT find! Thanks!

The “grow the economy” fools need to read this article.

The Economy is dynamic, always responding to market conditions, which are rarely repeated.

Hence, the Reagan Recovery, the Clinton Recovery and the Obama Recovery must be viewed through the lens of History.

The Obama Recovery has shown, IMHO, that the US Economy is very strong because it has managed to grow at the rate of 1-2 % in spite to Dictator Obama’s sworn policy of regulate, Control and DESTROY.


29 posted on 09/19/2012 8:10:47 AM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Clintons recovery is a myth. The 104th congress deserves all the credit, and Clinton deserves the blame for the economic melt down and mortgage fiasco. But the truth will never be told. Also let’s us not forget Reagans policies spurned the growth in the 90s.


30 posted on 09/19/2012 8:21:37 AM PDT by crazydad (-` sd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Forrestfire

The Internet Bubble was a symptom of the cause. The so-called Clinton Recovery was nothing more than future demand being brought forward via Credit Expansion. Bush II did the same thing hence the Housing Bubble. The ‘prosperity’ of the last 20+ years has been achieved at the expense of future generation’s work(capital creation) yet to be done. We have essentially spent their capital. And sadly we are not done robbing them yet, hence QE1, QE2. QE3 and so on and so forth.


31 posted on 09/19/2012 8:55:31 AM PDT by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Two words - “Peace Dividend”....


32 posted on 09/19/2012 9:05:55 AM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson