Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Elsie

Validity or veracity was not the issue. Reread the post I was responding to, particularly the quoted material she was responding to herself, and you’ll see where I was coming from. Notice there was no response? That’s because she was trying to tar an entire religion and its present followers by implication and utterly without justification. I was just giving her an opportunity to expose herself by bringing up the one event the Mormon haters always do, even though it happened more than 150 years ago (and as far as anybody knows, it wasn’t because people were “making fun” of” Mormonism). Contrast that record with the conduct of modern adherants to Islam and you the two religions are entirely different animals.


66 posted on 09/19/2012 10:46:54 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Trod Upon
I was just giving her an opportunity to expose herself by bringing up the one event the Mormon haters always do...

Nana; exposing herself?

She needs no opportunity to be presented, as she can find false teachings all by herself.


"Now if any of you will deny the plurality of wives, and continue to do so, I promise that you will be damned;

and I will go still further and say, take this revelation, or any other revelation that the Lord has given,

and deny it in your feelings, and I promise that you will be damned.

Brigham Young - JoD 3:266 (July 14, 1855)

67 posted on 09/20/2012 2:58:18 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Tennessee Nana

Ping to above


68 posted on 09/20/2012 2:58:42 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Trod Upon
That’s because she was trying to tar an entire religion and its present followers by implication and utterly without justification.

Oh?

You mean what was shown in post #43?

69 posted on 09/20/2012 3:00:11 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson