Posted on 09/14/2012 9:44:37 PM PDT by bronxville
[...]Now comes the part with the compelling case of no movie at all.
Abdurrahman writes (embedded link):
If you watch closely, you can see that when the actors are reading parts of the script that do not contain Islam-specific language, the audio from the sound stage is used (the audio that was recorded as the actors were simultaneously being filmed). But anytime the actors are referring to something specific to the religion (the Prophet Muhammed, the Quran, etc.) the audio recorded during filming is replaced with a poorly executed post-production dub. And if you look EVEN closer, you can see that the actors’ mouths are saying something other than what the dub is saying.
For example, at 2:53, the voiceover says “His name is Muhammed. And we can call him The Father Unknown.” In this case, the whole line is dubbed, and it appears the actor is actually saying, “His name is George (?). And we can call him The Father Unknown.” ...once you start to look for these dubs, it’s hard to see anything else.
And Grey writes (embedded link):
As the video above — cut from the YouTube video tied to a global controversy — shows, nearly all of the names in the movie's "trailer" — is a compilation of the most clumsily overdubbed moments from what is in reality an incoherent, haphazardly-edited set of scenes. Among the overdubbed words is "Mohammed," suggesting that the footage was taken from a film about something else entirely. The footage also suggests multiple video sources — there are obvious and jarring discrepancies among actors and locations... whoever made (it) may well have made use of little more than the standard editing software Final Cut Pro — far from a cast and crew of over 100 and millions of dollars. http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2012/0912/There-may-be-no-anti-Islamic-movie-at-all
(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...
If suspicions are right, the low-quality footage has been re-purposed from somewhere, and you'd expect someone to come forward and explain soon (since a lot of actors are involved).
What's really going on here? I have no idea."
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2012/0912/There-may-be-no-anti-Islamic-movie-at-all
Well, I guess the obvious answer is a false flag operation to get the Islamic horde cover for their coordinated attacks on 9/11 anniversary.
If it doesn’t have talking cats and dogs or Hitler in the bunker in it, it shouldn’t even be on Youtube.
Obama is trying to sell a YouTube clip as a Wag the Dog movie.
It is double-plus ungood to question the Ministry of Truth...
Why is no one mentioning that some of the egyptian rioters were wearing guy fawkes masks and spraypainting occupy graffiti on our embassy walls?
Is that the nonpracticing Coptic Christian who is/was in trouble with the law and spent $5 mil on an extremely crappy produced movie? I read where he had family over there, not sure why he’d want to make a movie in Arabic, knowing it was going to be shown over there, placing his family in danger, especially considering the crazy neighbors.
It’s interesting that they happened to find an actual Coptic Christian to blame.
I believe the whole thing is a set-up. But by who is the question to ask. We all ready know the why.
LOL
How did these dirt-poor Libyans *see* this film....most of them earn $2./day...what? They all have iPhones? ‘Net connections?
They were stirred up by their immams at services. Aided and abetted by our very own president...leading from behind.
After reading this article, I indeed call FALSE FLAG here.
I saw that too. Meanwhile the MSM is focusing on Romney being the bad guy.
My hope is the FBI is investigating so they can show that this “film” was changed by the muslims. If they’re investigating this because they want to “charge” the film maker with something such as inciting a riot, man, are we screwed.
This has all the hallmarks of a U.S. gov’t ‘cover story’ to protect 0bama.. Even the original author is FABRICATED TO BE AN ISRAELI to gin up heightened anger about the movie. Now we know this particular aspect isn’t true whatsoever. If 0bama’s goal is to create distrust in our gov’t, he’s doing a fine job of it.
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, Mesta.
And before that he was an Israeli Christian and just a few hours before that he was an Israeli Jew. The man is cutting a wide swath through life! /s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.