[Triple]

No wonder Obama is giving Bibi the cold shoulder...

Pretty simple analysis here, but they link to all the really good ones at the end (hot links at source).

[Will88]

Maybe Obama will ask Vladimir to have the KGB (or successor organization) render a more favorable opinion. Vladimir probably has more flexibility.

[RoosterRedux]

This is just the beginning.

Mossad and Bibi have the goods on Obama and want him out of the WH because he has betrayed our ally, Israel.

[ILS21R]

Looks real to me. Of course I'm getting paid $1.50/hr. trying desperately to sweep this thing under the rug.

[Zakeet]

Related ...

[upchuck]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2929245/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2929190/posts

[stockpirate]

I wonder how the whores in the conservative media will handle this news, oh wait, they will ignore it just as they did the other facts surroundng this issue. And trust me, they know who they are too.

[KarlInOhio]

Zoom into the document 800%. Scroll down until you see the serial number of the document "61 1064" in the top right-hand side of the document. In full page view the number appears as "61 10641". But, after magnification, the last digit "1" disappears! This last digit is also in a font that is different from the other digits. This is only one example. Many more examples can be discovered by examining magnified document with full page view of the document. In brief, this simple analysis using just a viewing software reveals that the PDF document has been doctored by a graphics software.

If this is all they have then they have nothing.

The document was scanned and it was broken into layers in preparation for optical character recognition. The sections that were recognized as characters were converted to monochrome (1-bit per pixel, not grayscale). That process was not perfect which is why some of the characters were left on the color graphics layer. None of that tells whether the scanned document was taken from a real microfilm record in Hawaii and printed onto their security paper, created by Obama's friends and printed on Hawaii's security paper, or just created entirely by Obama.

Here is an image of each layer I produced when this document came out: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2711155/posts?page=997#997 .

Right now I think that we will need someone trusted to look at the microfilm of the original birth certificate to see if it matches the surrounding birth certificates (same format, same hospital name, same typeface, etc). They've had a lot of time to create paper versions, but the "evidence" this author presents proves nothing one way or the other whether this was created or a real copy of the original.

[SWAMPSNIPER]

[cynwoody]

The article is just a rehash of the erroneous PDF layer argument, this time from Israel. You get similar effects when you scan random documents and prepare PDFs from them using software commonly distributed with or used in conjunction with office scanners. These PDF artifacts are merely the result of using such software and are not evidence of forgery.

If the document is a forgery, the fabrication needed to have taken place in 1961, long before digital imaging technology, PDFs, Photoshop, etc., existed. Thus, making a case for forgery based on digital technology is total nonsense.

How do we know the document is genuine? The State of Hawaii has officially verified that the White House document matches what Hawaii has on file:

Of course, it could still be a forgery, but that would be a whole 'nother level of conspiracy (LOL!), since it would require the involvement of officials of the government of Hawaii, up to and including a former Republican governor and current Senate candidate.

[Dajjal]

obumpa