Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Pay, No Play: Akin TV Ads Canceled
affton.patch.com ^ | 9-11-12 | Maggie Rotermund

Posted on 09/11/2012 7:18:04 AM PDT by doug from upland

No Pay, No Play: Akin TV Ads Canceled

Television ads for Republican Senate candidate Todd Akin have been canceled after Akin's campaign failed to pay the whole bill, Talking Points Memo reports.

By Maggie Rotermund Email the author 5:30 am

Rep. Todd Akin is facing a new round of bad publicity today after reports have emerged that he has failed to pay for his television advertising on time.

Talking Points Memo reports the Akin campaign’s TV ad buy with KOMU, a NBC affiliate in Columbia, was canceled.

According to KMOX, the campaign had paid the first half of the buy, but the station did not receive the other half. KOMU also said that it has confirmed that other stations have been put in the same position.

Sarah Mcadoo, an accounting assistant for KSHB-TV in Kansas City, confirmed to KOMU that Akin's ads had been pulled from their log. The Akin campaign told KOMU that the payment is forthcoming.

According to the KOMU story, Ryan Hite, campaign spokesman for Todd Akin, said:

"Our media buyers are constantly adjusting our strategy according to different media markets in Missouri. According to my understanding of this specific instance, air time was reserved, an initial payment was made, and when their ad schedule was set in stone, the other final portion of the payment is being sent tomorrow."

This follows on the heels of Akin's comments regarding legitimate rape. He has lost the financial backing of several national sources.

Conservative super PAC Crossroads GPS, founded by former Karl Rove, pulled its ads from the Missouri Senate race. Crossroads had been spending money on ads against McCaskill.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: akin; mccaskill; missouri; mo2012; notaboutme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: PhiloBedo

If Akin loses the race its because he’s an idiot who can’t keep saying incredibly stupid things.

He has a history of these gaffes.


81 posted on 09/11/2012 10:02:36 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (I need a good stiff drink. How 'bout you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Please see #80


82 posted on 09/11/2012 10:02:52 AM PDT by donozark (I was a Vietnam Veteran before it was popular...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: livius

Of course all the socons here love him and thinks this moron can still win.

They’re as stupid as he is.


83 posted on 09/11/2012 10:05:54 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (I need a good stiff drink. How 'bout you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Slayton

No, a private business suspended service to a chiseling DEADBEAT who wouldn’t pay his bills.


84 posted on 09/11/2012 10:09:35 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (I need a good stiff drink. How 'bout you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Tell that chiseler you support to pay his bills, then.


85 posted on 09/11/2012 10:11:51 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (I need a good stiff drink. How 'bout you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

Oh, he isn’t bothering me. The Republican panhandlers and grifters are the ones annoying me, like mosquitoes that have access to my telephone number, email and municipal addresses. Bums and parasites with DC and Mass. area codes, but panhandlers same as the yard guy with the rusted truck and the bent weedeater.


86 posted on 09/11/2012 10:21:37 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Where would Christianity be if the early believers put their hopes and trust in the Roman empire?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Rove and Priebus said that because Akin isn’t a team player and never learned the concept of taking one for your wingman.

He’s an egotistical narcissist, just like Barry.


87 posted on 09/11/2012 10:28:48 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (I need a good stiff drink. How 'bout you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: soycd

Maybe the Huck has donated to Akin, do you have further confirmation?


88 posted on 09/11/2012 10:31:52 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

These socons will cost us the senate over ONE damn issue.

Its a revolting prospect.

Boneheaded evangelicals who follow Huckabee aroujnd like puppy dogs....


89 posted on 09/11/2012 10:36:33 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (I need a good stiff drink. How 'bout you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

That’s just you dozen dinosaurs.


90 posted on 09/11/2012 10:38:23 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (I need a good stiff drink. How 'bout you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I think Akin will win even WITHOUT the GOP behind him

Remember when “Reince” Preibus was running to replace Michael Steele and him and all the other candidates said they were the ones who cherished the TEA party support and agreed with TEA party ideals... Remember that?

Because they sure don't

91 posted on 09/11/2012 10:41:01 AM PDT by Mr. K ("The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum [of good]")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Don’t you know that to the nmore unhinged evangelicals here that because of what they saikd Palin and West are now baby-killers and homo marriage-lovers.

These people here are completely nuts.


92 posted on 09/11/2012 10:41:58 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (I need a good stiff drink. How 'bout you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

lol.

Yep, they have totally forgotten


93 posted on 09/11/2012 10:43:50 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: donozark

Yes, a mess has been created. What if he is wrong and the money does not pour in after Sept 25? I don’t think it will. I guess it depends on the polls. No one wants to feel they are throwing away money, a finite resource.

Again comes the question - where are the people who vociferously defend him? Where is their money? If they believe in him, they would help get his ads out there.


94 posted on 09/11/2012 10:47:22 AM PDT by doug from upland (I don't like RINOs, but I love my country more than I hate Romney...Muslim marxist, get out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

You’re beginning to read as an unhinged drunk...go sleep it off.


95 posted on 09/11/2012 10:48:12 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
What that point is is anybody's guess.

Oh, I think we can all guess what the point is. The GOP-e is much more comfortable with a leftist in office than a conservative--regardless of party affiliation.
96 posted on 09/11/2012 10:50:47 AM PDT by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

Put the cap back on the Johnny Walker and go take a nap.


97 posted on 09/11/2012 10:58:38 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

“Akin’s mistake was easily survivable. The GOPe is forfeiting this seat, presumably to make a point.
What that point is is anybody’s guess.”

Their point is that Social Conservatives are NOT really welcome in the GOP. IF Social Conservatism is a priority to you, then they don’t what you as a GOP candidate. The only thing the GOPe wants from Social Conservatives are our votes...nothing more. They certainly aren’t going to honor ANY of our values.


98 posted on 09/11/2012 11:03:44 AM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

It is really quite a study in political realities isn’t it.

We have a strongly conservative six term Congressman. He was so strongly bound to his positions that he was never dependable or even possible for compromise to the Republican Majority in the House during the first half of the Bush Administration.

His positions were often stated with hyperbole, leaving a treasure trove of one liners, both in context and out of context, for a weakened “McCackles” to utilize in the general prompting her and her promoters to actually promote him as the “true conservative” opponent against two others that were each somewhat hampered by their own baggage with state republicans.

He gets the nomination as less controversial to conservative voters than the others — they each were only strong C+ pols— and what does he do as soon as he starts interviews after getting the nod?

He takes a TV reporter he is familiar with and seeing himself as the vast repository of “teachable moments” tries to inject a piss poor worded comment about the most extreme instances of abortion justification into his campaign — because he is so principled and smart, don’t you see.

The guy that never compromises is then left swinging in the wind trying to claw his way out of a hole that he himself fashioned in his road to election.

It begs the question, are generalities always flawed? Is successful politics always the “art of the possible.’ Is the “constitution a suicide pact”? Is everyone a RINO to someone else? Is Missouri going the way of the Republican Party in Kansas — so deeply divided that they can’t elect an executive or run a legislature — all without a liberal wing?

It would make a fine docu-drama.


99 posted on 09/11/2012 11:22:29 AM PDT by KC Burke (Plain Conservative opinions and common sense correction for thirteen years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

I live in MO and what killed him was the magic uterus. What people up here took was he think if you are raped and get pregnant, then it wasn’t really rape.
Bottom line is that a lot of people on here seem to be ok with losing the senate if they can feel like they are stcking it to the GOP. I agree with palin who says he should quit, and not claire mccaskill who wants him to stay in.


100 posted on 09/11/2012 11:30:50 AM PDT by chae (I was anti-Obama before it was cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson