Taliban 'Could Cut Links With Al Qaeda'

Thought I was clear.....I loathe the sumbitches, but the Taliban did NOT attack NYC on 9/11. If they’re sick of getting their butts kicked by our military and now want to distance themselves from al Quaeda.....fine; we’ll take it. To suggest they “started this” is inaccurate. Yes, they harbored al Quaeda types and backed them, but these are largely a group of uneducated rubes. It took some (sick) smarts to pull of 9/11, not to mention serious $$$ that only al Quaeda possessed.

A thought and probably a fact ... It would be nice to know how bad things really are. Best guess is things are really bad. Another best guess is our leadership, for whatever reason, on both sides of the isle have decided not to tell we the people anything about anything. Wonder why? Do they think we would panic?

That of which I typed is of more than simply the outlay mentioned. It involves much more than the arabs. Think corner, and where our nation is in this the present. Are we (Americans) in the corner, or do we want them to think we are in the corner? Do they have us where they want us, or have we played 'rope-a-dope'?

"...Also, during the late 1997s and early '98, while the Taliban imposed a blockade on more than 2 million people of Hazara ethnic group which is located in Central Afghanistan. This blockade put tens of thousands of people at risk of starving to death after perishing from lack of medicine during the harsh winter months. The state department undercut my efforts to send two planeloads of medicine by the Ameri-cares and Knights-bridge relief agencies. The State Department representatives made false statements that a humanitarian crisis had been exaggerated and that there was already sufficient medical supplies in the blockaded area. When the relief team's risked their lives to go into that area anyway with the medicines that we raised privately, and I say without the support of the State Department, on April 14, 1999

The State Department in effect was assisting the Taliban's inhumane blockade intended to starve out communities, which opposed their dictates. Perhaps the most glaring evidence of this administration's tacit support was the effort made during the Spring of 1998, when a visit to Afghanistan made by Mr. Inderfurth who will be with us today and the United Nations Ambassador Bill Richardson. These administration representatives convinced the anti-Taliban northern alliance not to go on the offensive against a then weakened and vulnerable Taliban. Instead they convinced the anti-Taliban leaders to accept a cease-fire that was proposed by Pakistan. This cease-fire lasted only as long as it took the Pakistanis to re-supply and reorganize the Taliban. In fact within a few months of the announcement of the U.S. backed Ulima (ph) process, the Taliban freshly supplied by the ISI from Pakistan and flush with drug money went on a major offensive and destroyed the northern alliance.

So, our administration, at a pivotal moment, interceded in a way that brought the Taliban to almost complete power in Afghanistan. This was either incompetence on the part of the State Department and US intelligence agencies, or it is indicative of a real policy, the real policy of our government to insure a Taliban victory. Can anyone believe that with a Taliban, identified by the United Nations and the DEA as one of the two largest producers of Opium in the world; that they weren't being closely monitored by our intelligence services who would have seen every move of the military buildup of the Pakistanis and when they tried to build up the forces of the Taliban...."

--- US congressman Dana Rohrabacher, 1999

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.