Are you in the camp that calls anyone who thinks Mitt is easier to work with than Obama, a fan girl?
Your question is presumptive and leading on a couple of different levels. I'm not even going to try to tackle every angle I see in there.
I suppose I could answer, no, but with the qualifier that I am in the camp that believes that Romney only stands a couple of paces to Obama's right, and that he's a big government statist who will do nothing to roll back the current elitist agenda that's destroying this country.
A cursory look at his record as Governor of Massachusetts will better inform a person of what to expect from him as president, than anything else I can think of. He's never stood for anything resembling a conservative ideal in his life (campaign rhetoric, notwithstanding), and a solid case can be made that he is, in fact, a stealth liberal with an R velcroed to his sleeve.
The problem with a Romney presidency is that a Republican dominated Congress is going to try to "work with" him, instead of opposing him on his inevitable left-of-center agenda. All of this poppycock about 'holding his feet to the fire' is just that. He's already doing the etch-a-sketch, and no one's stopping him. Once he's in office - good luck. He'll do whatever he and his globalist buddies want, which won't bear any substantial difference to what Obama and his Socialist buddies have been doing for the last four years.
If you're one of those who's been promising that he's gonna fix Obama's mess, then you're one of those who's gonna get their heart broken. Especially if you've sold your conservative principles out, to support him.
On November 7th, I think the good news will be that Obama has lost, but the bad news will be that Romney has won.