Posted on 09/08/2012 7:59:44 PM PDT by EveningStar
President Obama is appearing in yet another television commercial in the Massachusetts Senate race. This time, it was not produced by the Democratic candidate, Elizabeth Warren, but by the Republican, Senator Scott P. Brown.
The advertisement, which was scheduled to start running on Saturday, shows Mr. Obama praising Mr. Brown for sponsoring a bill to end insider trading in Congress. As Mr. Obama signs the measure into law, he thanks Mr. Brown, saying, Good job.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Your posts might be applicable to others on this thread but they are not applicable to me.
Why don’t you take a look at my other comments on this thread before you rip into me?
I understand how things work in a blue state. It’s difficult for a super conservative to get elected in a statewide office in the Northeast. Therefore, I’m OK with Scott Brown. If I lived in MA I’d vote for him.
I should have made this clear in my initial post.
As I said, “There is not one comment in the first 50 that refer to his sponsoring a bill to end insider trading in Congress.” It’s as though everyone read the title and maybe the first sentence.
These days, I see so many comments that have nothing to do with the articles. People seem to be proud they didn’t read the full article. Are these the results of public schooling?
I can understand someone not understanding what the author is trying to say but posting remarks that have nothing to do with the article show total ignorance.
I more or less responded to your post because I agreed with it very much. I was trying to convey the thought that some anti Romney people are anti everything.
Are you not voting for Romney?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.