[Slump Tester]

And then they BOOED! What losers!

[djrakowski]

First, they voted on God, and rejected Him 3 times, regardless of what Villaraigosa declared. Then, they booed him. What a bunch of degenerates!

[GeronL]

bump

[rovenstinez]

Just showing at their core how tolerant they actually are.

[SnakeDoctor]

The booing can be written off to booing the fact that the delegates were railroaded by the process.

The vocal “no” vote on God and Jerusalem cannot be so innocently explained. We should focus on the vocal no’s ... not the boos.

SnakeDoc

[Pietro]

The important irony here is that the dhims didn't even follow their own rules.

By not gaining a 2/3rds vote for the amandment God should not have been included. But they inclded it anyway; so there dhimis, shove it up your bunghole.

Naturally, the abstract thought required to understand this illegal action will be lost on the majority of the dhimmi party.

[utahagen]

In fairness to the people who booed — I am being sincere here — they did have a right to boo because their votes were being disregarded. There is no way that the Ayes were at 2/3. In fact, it sounded as if all three votes went to the nays. When Viliagrosa said, “It's approved”, that was a lie. I don't blame the people who had voted “Nay” for being ticked off (not that I agree with their anti-God position, of course).