Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

Why are some Libertarians supporting Mitt Romney? Mitt isn’t a “small government conservative”!


12 posted on 09/07/2012 8:05:02 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (The world continues to be stuck in a "all leftist, all of the time" funk. BUNK THE FUNK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: johnthebaptistmoore

Maybe they finally get the “big picture” now.


14 posted on 09/07/2012 8:20:40 AM PDT by ILS21R (The time is nigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
Why are some Libertarians supporting Mitt Romney? Mitt isn’t a “small government conservative”!

If the American people vote for Obama's re-election there is not a snowballs chance in hell there will ever be a small government President elected. Regardless of Romney's past he is running now against big government and that is how he is being potrayed by Obama. Most independents have no clue about conservatives fears about Romney and see him as more conservative than Obama. If they vote for Obama anyway then it's all over for conservatives at the national level.

15 posted on 09/07/2012 8:25:53 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
Why are some Libertarians supporting Mitt Romney? Mitt isn’t a “small government conservative”!

From the legal dictionary (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Mitigation+of+Damages):

Mitigation of Damages

The use of reasonable care and diligence in an effort to minimize or avoid injury. Under the mitigation of damages doctrine, a person who has suffered an injury or loss should take reasonable action, where possible, to avoid additional injury or loss. The failure of a plaintiff to take protective steps after suffering an injury or loss can reduce the amount of the plaintiff's recovery. The mitigation of damages doctrine is sometimes called minimization of damages or the doctrine of Avoidable Consequences.

When you nail plywood to your windows or put sandbags around your house prior to a storm, you are technically damaging your house and creating work for yourself (as all this will have to be undone at a later time), but you are preventing the greater damage that would be done by a storm breaking out your windows and flood waters getting into your house.

Voting for Romney is how you protect against the damage a 2nd Obama term would do.

Mitigating damages is smart.

19 posted on 09/07/2012 8:45:59 AM PDT by Brookhaven (The Democratic Party has become the Beclowning Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

>>Why are some Libertarians supporting Mitt Romney? Mitt isn’t a “small government conservative”!<<

Possibly because either Romney or Obama will be the President for the next four years and Obama is a big government socialist/Marxist, sort of the opposite of what Libertarians stand for?

Gary Johnson is an interesting candidate and would make a far better President than Obama, but voting for him now just helps Obama win. Elections are about choices, and we don’t always get our personally preferred candidate onto the final ballot.


21 posted on 09/07/2012 8:58:49 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left-Completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson