Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justlurking
That information was sealed by the court. Even Ryan's ex-wife wanted to keep it sealed. Another judge broke the seal, for no reason other than to embarrass Ryan and help Obama.

You missed my point, which was that the issue of how the information comes out is irrelevant. The onus still remains entirely on the candidate who risks his party's victory in the election on his ability to keep something he did secret that would severely impact his ability to win at the ballot box.

43 posted on 09/05/2012 10:48:09 PM PDT by JediJones (Upcoming Democrat Presidential Primary: Tuesday, November 6, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones
The onus still remains entirely on the candidate who risks his party's victory in the election on his ability to keep something he did secret that would severely impact his ability to win at the ballot box.

What if he didn't actually do it? What if his wife's lawyer claimed that he did it? And he wasn't aware of it?

Point being, Ryan can't be held responsible for what his wife's lawyer entered into the divorce record.

45 posted on 09/05/2012 11:06:18 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson