Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL; stephenjohnbanker; Verginius Rufus; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican

I failed to notice the author of this piece, shock of shocks it’s Pat Buchanan. Guy is sure no fiscal conservative (or intelligent political commentator).

I wish Former Governor Frank Lowden of Ill. had excepted Coolidge’s VP offer in 1924 (he was nominated and declined, possibly the only time that has happened). Hoover was popular (he won the nomination easily over Lowden and others) but he might have stood a chance against him in 1928 as the sitting VP.

I don’t know what kind of Prez he would have been (he sounds good) but it could not possibly have turned out any worse.

It would have even been preferable to have Al Smith as President. At the least that would have meant no FDR in 1932. Possibly no anti-GOP backlash at all.


40 posted on 09/06/2012 1:57:50 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Impy

Had Smith won and had he presumably followed a similar course as Hoover, it still may have resulted in the GOP moving leftward for 1932 and perhaps nominating Hoover for a rematch (for which Smith would’ve almost assuredly lost). Hoover, of course, would’ve proceeded to exacerbate the problem (as FDR did), and we might’ve faced an even more frightening scenario for 1936... Governor/Senator Huey Long as the Democrat nominee.


47 posted on 09/07/2012 12:08:02 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson