It seems your analysis is SOP for most states.
So, for an SOS to legaly clear Obama, it seems they must first have access to all that Hawaii has.
Then make the call, thumbs up or thumbs down. They can still allow him to run, but must see all his records to make a legal declaration of fact.
Maybe amendments are the biggets problem. Adopted by Indonesian citizen, and new name. Barry Soetoro. Then changed back again. Fathers name amended.
So the certifcate data it seems is a “moving target” over time, verification being impossible without a full trail of amendments that have occured since intial creation, August of 1961.
The day after he gets nominated, law suits start to fly again?
Would verification problems be common for an adopted person? Or is this unusual?
When either an adoption or an unadoption takes place, the result is that one or the other of two birth certificates is considered legally valid and the other is non-valid and sealed. The verification would be based on whichever one is valid at the time. So when an adoption occurs it isn’t considered an amendment; a new birth certificate is created and none of the changes because of the adoption are noted as amendments.