Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Just saw this. When you think about hunting lions, keeping slaves in the 21st century, think Moslems....
1 posted on 09/03/2012 12:19:29 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

Make way for the new masters


2 posted on 09/03/2012 12:21:00 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

big game hunting....Where’s PETA????


3 posted on 09/03/2012 4:30:30 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

Plan B should be to issue the Maasai sniper rifles, to let them hunt “corporate sponsored Middle Eastern kings and princes”.

However, I suspect there may be more to the story than meets the eye. Notice the keywords in the article, “corporate sponsored”, “Middle Eastern kings and princes”, and “delicate ecosystem”. Something smells funny.

And how about this little burble of socialist internationalist crapola:

“Recently, Oxfam has claimed that the lifestyle of the Maasai should be embraced as a response to climate change because of their ability to farm in deserts and scrublands.

“Many Maasai tribes throughout Tanzania and Kenya welcome visits to their village to experience their culture, traditions, and lifestyle.”

Compare this to a description of Oxfam:

“For anyone that has followed the rise and activities of Oxfam throughout the years, it is well known that their primary focus is political advocacy - always of a socialist variety - and secondary focus is on actually delivering aid.

“Oxfam is becoming less and less embarrassed about advocating its socialist agenda due to not been challenged in our now morally inverted, post-modern world.

“The first give away that they’re a leftist advocacy group is their motto “United for a more equitable world”.

“Less than half of every dollar donated to Oxfam goes to what the public expects a charity to be doing. The rest goes on supporting the socialist political goals that, ironically, maintain the ongoing poverty of their core constituency as was proven beyond doubt, and to the cost of 100 million people, in the 20th century.”


4 posted on 09/03/2012 8:13:02 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson