Not guilty!
Posted on 09/02/2012 7:10:40 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement
Paul Ryan's African-American college sweetheart has spent time in prison for wire fraud, it emerged today. Deneeta Pope hit headlines after MailOnline revealed that she was the Republican vice-presidential candidate's ex-girlfriend who opened his eyes to the evils of racism.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
....guess they don’t wanna know about Odungo’s ex-lover...
I’m confused
Is this junk supposed to gain Ryan the felon vote?
Or lose it?
“they don’t want it getting out that Ryan had a black girlfriend.”
And they sure didn’t want it known that she had “opened his eyes to racism.”
Clinton and most democrats I despise because of what I know about them. Obama I despise because of what I don’t know about him.
Ex-lover? How do they know this?
Peanuts compared to what Obama’s wife “stole.” Where’s Michelle’s license to practice law?
It’s typical and representative of double standards which are espoused through liberalism.
Part of me suspects she was told “Do a hit-piece interview where you accuse Paul Ryan of date-rape and racist abuse, or we put all your dirty laundry on display”, and she refused.
I have never met a liberal who wasn’t in some way hypocritical.
Well that’s it!!!
I’m voting for Odumbo now! /s
LOL
They dated. Did he hit it? Were they really “Lovers”.
Which one of them admitted to having sex?
I doubt Ryan would have said he hit it? Did She?
Or is it just assumed?
The MSM doesn't do their own 'research'.
That's done by dem PR Firms like the kind Carville runs. TV 'personalities' don't have time to do their own thinking. Members of MSM justify it by their great ability to spot a good idea ( stealing someone else's work - and claiming it as their own).
Editors and on-air types wait for the good stuff to be fed to them. It's why these empty suits ask the same questions and come up with the same 'insights' on the same day.
Ever wonder about that?
If TV 'personalities'weren't being 'fed' they would come across as they really are: highly attractive but empty shoe salesmen.
Having been associated with very left-leaning individuals for many years until that watershed moment when it just became no longer possible to remain friendly despite some glaring political differences, that moment being 9/11, I can shed a little light. Sex is politics and politics is sex to these people. There is no escaping it. Not just who you have sex with but who you are as well, has political connotation.
Otherwise heterosexual people, both male and female, will deliberately pursue same sex relations and learn to like it or at least pretend to like it, because to do so is a revolutionary act that undermines the dominant paradigm, That being the male WASP patriarchy. Understand that everything they do is couched in these terms and you’ll begin to see through the rationalizations and the propaganda smokescreen.
Through this lense, warped though it is, Paul Ryan is racist for subjecting a black female to white male dominance. It doesn’t show him to be openminded and lacking racial bias as so many perceive to be the case, as far as they’re concerned, and they will therefore construct a narrative that is as damaging to him as possible. Weird, yes. Nihilist, yes. But, it is so, I lived it.
Never could bring myself to embrace the political (insert four letter, ribald Anglo-Saxon term for the physical act here), it’s completely at odds with any semblance of normal human interaction and totally opposed to my upbringing, despite having rather thoroughly strayed from it for a number of years. They knew it, too, I was never fully accepted by that bunch, never could be. The divide was stark even then.
They’re not like you and I, not at all. Attempting to even understand them, let alone counter them in the war of culture and ideas, will be futile until we grasp just how thoroughly depraved the underlying philosophies are, as well as the groups and individuals who are leading the way.
Can't be true, George Stephanopoulos, "Good Morning America" host, himself, has stated that there is NO MEDIA BIAS. Obviously, as a journalist (and former Clinton Administration official) we MUST BELIEVE him.
Last week's Economist (Brit-US business oriented news magazine) had a cover story, "So Mitt, What do you Really Believe?" I don't recall anything similar from 2008 concerning Obama. Actually, what we should have had from an honest media is, "So Barak, Who are you Really?"
Thing is, I wonder if Mr Stephanopoulos was consciously lying or stating his honest personal belief. Personally, I cannot believe that anyone with an above room temp IQ and not living in a cave could hold to such a belief, but maybe I am wrong.
She supports Obama. Wth. What does it have to do with either. It’s so clear what they are doing. Stoking racism hatred towards him while they tie her criminality to him.
Not guilty!
Well said, my friend
Well said, my friend
Not a Composite.
Not from concentrate.
Real.
'Ugly warts' and all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.