Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator
Because none of them stood out that much from the other.

Sure they did. We had some very emotional debates about each and every one of them on this website. I remember that you were involved in some of them.

The point is not that Rove and Co. stuck us with Romney. Conservatives are purists by nature, and many of us got caught up in the flavor of the month when Mittens was never polling above 25% and the nomination was there for the taking. I recognized Gingrich's many flaws, but I settled on him and tried to get others to see the logic in doing so, as opposed to first Bachmann, then Cain, then Santorum, none of whom ever had a chance of winnning. All they did was take votes away from the one legitimate challenger. Now were're stuck with Romney, and I'm being as enthusiastic about the man as I can be. The point in politics is to understand that you never get everything you want and do what it takes to win.

17 posted on 09/01/2012 4:45:30 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: presidio9

They all had flaws, that was the problem, it was easy in 1980, because clearly Reagan was head and shoulders above everybody else.


19 posted on 09/01/2012 4:48:45 PM PDT by dfwgator (I'm voting for Ryan and that other guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

You’re spot on, FRiend. Now it is what it is, but Obama has still got to go.


43 posted on 09/01/2012 5:43:52 PM PDT by Gator113 (I would have voted for NEWT, now it's Ryan and the other guy.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson