Skip to comments.
Karl Rove Wants to Kill Conservatives and Play Nice with Obama
Right Side News ^
| 9/1/2012
| Cliff Kincaid
Posted on 09/01/2012 3:58:59 PM PDT by RightSideNews
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: RightSideNews
Karl Rove believes the United States would be better off the Democrats lost control of the Senate. By refusing to step down, Akins has shown that he disagrees. Akins is putting his pride above his country and he has done immense damage to the pro-life movement.
At best, Akins is a vain fool. That is why the Democracts supported him in the primary.
To: submarinerswife
he handed McCaskill the Senate seat in Missouri where she is very unpopular.I didn't realize that the election was over. Do you live in the future???
To: Java4Jay
This piece is spot on! Cliff Kincaid is absolutely right about Rove.
23
posted on
09/01/2012 4:55:33 PM PDT
by
SUSSA
To: kitkat; China Clipper
What are your names at Planned Parenthood?
You are promoting the first officially, openly, aggressively, pro abortion republican presidential candidate in history, one who is officially rejecting the republican Party Platform on abortion.
24
posted on
09/01/2012 5:02:24 PM PDT
by
ansel12
( Aug. 27, 2012-Mitt Romney said his views on abortion are more lenient than the Republican Platform)
To: dfwgator
They all had flaws, that was the problem, it was easy in 1980, because clearly Reagan was head and shoulders above everybody else. "And if a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his ass 'a hoppin..."
25
posted on
09/01/2012 5:04:42 PM PDT
by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does.)
To: RightSideNews
Blinded by the light power. That's Rove.
26
posted on
09/01/2012 5:05:03 PM PDT
by
upchuck
("Definition of 'racist:' someone that is winning an argument with a liberal." ~ Peter Brimelow)
To: MDspinboyredux
See post 24, mister conservative. You’ve come a long way baby.
27
posted on
09/01/2012 5:05:22 PM PDT
by
ansel12
( Aug. 27, 2012-Mitt Romney said his views on abortion are more lenient than the Republican Platform)
To: goldfinch
You are right. I have been writing about the dangers of Rove since 2001 - but he happens to be right about Akin. That doesn’t make me like Rove any more than I did before, it just means I can be analytical and non-emotional and simply dissect an issue as it comes.
28
posted on
09/01/2012 5:17:20 PM PDT
by
C. Edmund Wright
("You Might Be a Liberal" (YMBAL) Coming out Sept 1 by C. Edmund Wright)
To: ansel12
But Ansel, you miss the point totally with that ridiculous statement.
He’s still far far less openly, officially, less aggressively, less pro abortion than his opponent. I know that messes up your whole schtick to admit it, so you won’t admit it, but it’s the truth.
29
posted on
09/01/2012 5:20:01 PM PDT
by
C. Edmund Wright
("You Might Be a Liberal" (YMBAL) Coming out Sept 1 by C. Edmund Wright)
To: China Clipper
I sat out the last presidential election because I didn't have anyone to vote for.
I may wind up doing the same thing this time around - largely because I have lost faith in my fellow citizens' abilities to discern, practice and defend liberty. Lesson not taught, lesson not learned.
30
posted on
09/01/2012 5:21:59 PM PDT
by
elkfersupper
( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
To: submarinerswife
If insanity is doing the same thing over...it would be insane to dump one of the most conservative congressmen (Akin) who is running for the senate. Only a total IDIOT would vote for Claire over Akin.
Akin has won numerous elections in MO and most of them he won big. It is remarks by Rove and Coulter that are hurting a good man that made a inane comment which he apologized for but Rove should be reprimanded publicly for his sick comment. He also made a comment about Cain's campaign being “deadly” at one time. Who in the hell does that fat jerk think he is? GOOOOOOOOOOOO AKIN!
To: RightSideNews
Rove’s last hurrah before he sinks into the muck and obscurity. And take your dog whistle with you.
To: elkfersupper
largely because I have lost faith in my fellow citizens' abilities to discern, practice and defend liberty. Lesson not taught, lesson not learned.
Seems that we're interested in punishing and not interested in fixing.
33
posted on
09/01/2012 5:26:07 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: RightSideNews
Rove is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. I don’t quite dislike him as much as I dislike Obama....but it’s very close.
34
posted on
09/01/2012 5:29:06 PM PDT
by
Ms Mable
To: ansel12
Yeah, and the vajayjay costume-wearing Code Pink knuckleheads are paragons of pro-life conservative values. and you claim Romney is the bad one. Sheesh.
You talk a big game, but in reality you Paulbots are provacateurs with an agenda and nothing more.
To: RightSideNews
Rove is from the Bush wing of the GOP. He’s irrelevant. Stay out da Bushes.
36
posted on
09/01/2012 5:33:59 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: dfwgator
let's do that a bit differently. There were 16 candidates registered with the RNC (at least ~ some have identified more but I don't know if they ever went official or public).
Three candidates were lifelong Conservative Republicans. Every single one of the other 13 were not.
There were former Democrats, current Democrats, probably future Democrats, Libertarians, Democrat donors, etc. Some had been elected to office; others had been involved in campaigns for other than Republican purposes.
So, it was 13 to 3, and one of the 13 couldn't break 22% most of the time, but there were those others who managed to snag enough votes to make the 3 lifelong folks come up a bit short of a resoundingly large number, and at the same time they managed to make the 22% tallies look serious.
Obviously the Republican party has some difficulty in controlling its brand name ~
If we'd had but the three lifelong Republican Conservatives running we'd picked a leader by late April and that'd been that. The other 13 should have been dumped at the get go.
37
posted on
09/01/2012 5:35:44 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: C. Edmund Wright
Hes still far far less openly, officially, less aggressively, less pro abortion than his opponent.Then if you live in Missouri go and vote for Obamacare-loving McCaskill.
To: MDspinboyredux
Not only are you supporting changing the GOP position on abortion, you show how silly you are by labeling people paulbots, you sure don’t read people well.
39
posted on
09/01/2012 5:37:30 PM PDT
by
ansel12
( Aug. 27, 2012-Mitt Romney said his views on abortion are more lenient than the Republican Platform)
To: C. Edmund Wright
No, that was a childish statement.
You are promoting the first officially, openly, aggressively, pro abortion republican presidential candidate in history, one who is officially rejecting the republican Party Platform on abortion, you are seeking a change in the GOP with your vote.
40
posted on
09/01/2012 5:41:17 PM PDT
by
ansel12
( Aug. 27, 2012-Mitt Romney said his views on abortion are more lenient than the Republican Platform)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson