Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9

I have not followed this debate until akin muttered his ignorance so I may have missed the debate over how the funding
for raising all these new members of society will be handled. Once the mandate that all birth control be eliminated
is in place, what tax mechanism will be used?


26 posted on 09/01/2012 2:13:58 PM PDT by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: soycd

It’s strange that you gave Zer0 consideration to a private sector solution.


32 posted on 09/01/2012 2:32:06 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: soycd

You are pro-abortion because you fear that new people might become a burden like public transportation costs?


34 posted on 09/01/2012 2:42:16 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Aug. 27, 2012-Mitt Romney said his views on abortion are more lenient than the Republican Platform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: soycd
I have not followed this debate until akin muttered his ignorance so I may have missed the debate over how the funding for raising all these new members of society will be handled. Once the mandate that all birth control be eliminated is in place, what tax mechanism will be used?

How about private charity, orphanages, and they innate protectiveness that (most of) society has for newborns, same as it was before Roe. Checked the waiting lists for healthy newborn adoptions lately?

36 posted on 09/01/2012 2:51:16 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: soycd
how the funding for raising all these new members of society will be handled.

We seem to be able to find funding for all sorts of other projects that don't pay off till years later.

Human life creates wealth, not poverty. The economic stagnation of Europe and Japan (and increasingly in the USA) is the result of disproportionately aging populations that aren't being succeeded by new generations of young producers and consumers. Investment capital in the hands of the old has no place to go. Tax revenues are inadequate to meet needs because worldwide billions of people have been prevented from being born. This is why socialized health care increasingly pushes euthanasia as a way to dodge social security and health care costs of the elderly

37 posted on 09/01/2012 2:56:37 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: soycd
I have not followed this debate until akin muttered his ignorance so I may have missed the debate over how the funding for raising all these new members of society will be handled. Once the mandate that all birth control be eliminated is in place, what tax mechanism will be used?

The major use of abortion is as a primary method of birth control. Therefore, it is unlikely that a massive spike in births would occur if the legality of abortion were reversed today. Those now using abortion would use one of the many contraceptives already available.

Your pro-abortion sentiment really gives itself away in your next sentence. No one has ever suggested that contraceptives be banned or even limited. That's a strawman abortion advocates raise whenever there is talk of even the most minor and reasonable "restrictions" (such as requiring full disclosure about fetal development prior to an abortion). Any person with half a brain knows that promoting contraceptive use leads to fewer pregnancies.

89 posted on 09/02/2012 5:19:26 AM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson