[chris37]

What I have defended is the mother’s right to consent, which was violated by her rapist, and you are also attempting to do the exact same thing.

If your position was as cut and dry as you think it is, then everyone should agree with it, but they don’t.

I have said this before, and I will say it again. You will never succeed in passing into law forcing a rape victim to bear the child of her rapist.

Ever.

It is absolute madness.

[ansel12]

That post wasn’t a response to me, we haven’t been having that discussion.

[muawiyah]

BTW Chris, we need to have a decision from a court of law that the rapist is, in fact, a rapist, and the father of the child ~ and then we need to execute the rapist BEFORE the child.

I don't really know how long trials take but it's dollars to doughnuts the trial and execution will take long enough for the baby to be born, and maybe even start walking around.

Would you accept it as a desirable outcome of the law that the authorities then take the child and execute her?