Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chris37
BTW Chris, we need to have a decision from a court of law that the rapist is, in fact, a rapist, and the father of the child ~ and then we need to execute the rapist BEFORE the child.

I don't really know how long trials take but it's dollars to doughnuts the trial and execution will take long enough for the baby to be born, and maybe even start walking around.

Would you accept it as a desirable outcome of the law that the authorities then take the child and execute her?

91 posted on 08/31/2012 6:07:48 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

O...K...

All I can tell you is that you guys are somewhat insane on this. I’m being generous with the word somewhat, I probably should use completely...but anyway, Your position isn’t reasonable, it LACKS reason as evidenced by this...bizarre post...

The reason it will never be law is because it isn’t reasonable to force a woman to bear the child of her rapist if she doesn’t want to.

While I am certain you can find people who agree with your position, I am also quite certain you will never find enough of them to FORCE IT ON RAPE VICTIMS FOR CHRIST’S SAKE!

I mean seriously...I think I’m getting a little disgusted with this conversation.


104 posted on 08/31/2012 6:33:10 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson